Stat wise no granite is slightly better but rune is more popular due to its low price and good defence stats. =)
Chat with our AI personalities
yes because a granite maul has a special attack but it is members but a rune 2h is free to play and is better than most weapons with its smash attack
ANSWER #1: Well im not sure wether granite is better then rune (i hear alot of rumours) but I can run from the G.E to falador with full granite with only lvl 9 agility and that makes like no difference....it is only a little better. right now, its close to being almost 100k more than rune pl8. its really heavy, and only give alittle bit more than the rune pl8. i would stick with the rune if i were you. . .another one is dragon pl8 skirt and legs. same stats, but the legs are alomst 1m and the skirt is like 170k.ANSWER #2: Granite is better defence stats apart from the helm so if i was you i would buy full granite but with a rune full helm that way you have the most amount of defence stats and its lighter than if you had the granite helm on
Definately Granite maul, it hits alot better, isn't as fast, but it also has a very good special attack. So..i would suggest using the Granite maul.
Yes - the rune chainbody is better.
Not even close. The Rune Scimitar is better when it comes to attack stats. The blurite sword's defense stats are actually a little better then the rune Rune Scimitar's.