if you have collision coverage file under that then your company will subrogate the uninsured driver...if no collision coverage you can file a state report, and/or small claims action.....
Some do. I work for an insurance company and many will take ownership of the accident.
If you are involved in an automobile accident caused by another driver, and that driver carries no insurance, your no-fault clause is designed to protect your financial interests.
He may be at fault for not having insurance. He may or may not be at fault for the accident. Whether or not a driver carries insurance is a separate issue than the one concerning who is at fault in an accident. Do not confuse them or let them overlap. A good, objective assessor won't.
If there is no other vehicle involved in the accident, then the only person who can be at fault is the underage driver.
If a driver in Missouri is involved in a car accident without insurance and is not at fault, they may still face legal consequences. Missouri law requires all drivers to carry minimum liability insurance. If an uninsured driver is not at fault in an accident, they may still be held financially responsible for damages. Additionally, they may face fines, license suspension, and other penalties for driving without insurance. It is important for all drivers to carry proper insurance coverage to protect themselves in case of an accident.
Usually if an accident is determined not to be the insured's fault, then their insurance rates will not rise as the insurance company did not lose any money from covering the driver involved in the accident. If the accident is determined as being inconclusive, the rates may rise some, to adjust for the amount of money the insurance company lost in the accident.
I was recently involved in a car accident in which the driver of the other car is legally at fault. Is the other party's insurance still liable for damages involved if the at fault driver is: 1. not the owner of the car, 2. not the insurer of the car, 3. does not have a license. Thanks!
Who is at fault has to do with the accident itself not the insurance coverage. A police report of the accident and looking at the proximate cause of the accident help determine fault.
No, but if involved in an accident, even when not at fault, the drunk driver would still be guilty of, and could be charged with, DUI.
If I understand your question you are in an accident not your fault and it was settled, but the insurance was through a different company than the one you had ? I think they can hike the rates.
Anybody involved in an accident. Damages are covered regardless of fault.
Sue