If your opponent attacks a face-down Earthbound Immortalmonster, continue through all of the steps of a battle (Battle Step and Damage Step). After the Damage Step has concluded, if there is no face-up Field Spell Card, the Earthbound Immortal is destroyed.
If your opponent activated Swords of Revealing Light, flip the Earthbound Immortal monster face-up. If there is no face-up Field Spell Card, all of the Earthbound Immortalmonsters are destroyed.
While the answer would be 'yes' if we were talking about Legendary Fisherman + Umi, or Guardian Kay'est, it has been ruled differently for the Earthbound Immortals. You may not declare a direct attack in this case, even if the player's only monster is an Earthbound Immortal.
yes of course what knuckle hea said you couldn't
ah, my specialty. Well, that depends. Does your opponent use compulsory evacuation device (i think) when you attack them? Because then the attack is negated. If a player controls one monster, and this monster can't be selected as an attack target, then you may attack directly. So one situation will be if the player has Umi and The Legendary Fisherman, or Guardian Kay'est. These can be ignored, and a direct attack can be made. However - this does not apply if the one monster is an Earthbound Immortal. If a player only controls one monster, and this is an Earthbound Immortal, then he cannot be attacked in the same way, the monster cannot be bypassed, monsters will simply be unable to attack. This is a specifically ruled difference, though without explanation from Konami. If the player controls two unattackable monsters, then again, player and monsters are safe from being attacked. No attacks can be declared against any of them unless circumstances change.
The following monsters inflict damage to your opponent when destroyed. Some of these effects will depend on whether you or your opponent destroyed it and/or if it was destroyed in battle or by a card effect:AbakiEarthbound Immortal Aslla piscuBalloon LizardMecha-Dog MarronOxygeddon
Number 92 Heart-eartH Dragon states that your opponent takes any battle damage that would be dealt to you. So if you attacked their 3000ATK monster, Heart-eartH will not be destroyed, you will take no battle damage, the 3000 that you would take, is dealt to the opponent instead.
Even though Earthbound Immortal Cusillu can not be attacked by the opponent, the controller of this monster can attack an opponent's attack position monster.After attacking with Cusillu and calculating any damage you receive in battle, you may tribute another monster you control and reduce your opponent's Life Point in half. This all takes place during the Damage Step and the tribute is treated as an effect, not a cost.
Confusion Chaff will resolve as normal. Note that Earthbound Immortals say "The opponent cannot select this monster as an attack target" - this is not happening here. The opponent is not declaring any attacks against your Earthbound Immortal.
the person is not allowed to atack until the equip card is destroyed
They 'can' attack directly, meaning they are free to attack the opponent's monsters instead if you wish.
While the answer would be 'yes' if we were talking about Legendary Fisherman + Umi, or Guardian Kay'est, it has been ruled differently for the Earthbound Immortals. You may not declare a direct attack in this case, even if the player's only monster is an Earthbound Immortal.
yes of course what knuckle hea said you couldn't
Earthbound monsters are good for most decks as long as the deck meets these basic requirements:There is an ample supply of field cards in the deck!Earthbounds are destroyed if there is no face-up Field Spell card. No field cards, no Earthbounds.There is a good amount of tribute fodder (monsters available for Tribute Summoning). However, having cards that can help Special Summon them (or any other monster for that matter) is a major plus.Adding an Earthbound monster(s) doesn't break the flow of your deck or side track from the deck's winning strategy. In other words, does the Earthbound monster(s) you want to add inhibit your deck. If you have a strategy of winning by attacking, all of the Earthbounds are great since they all can attack directly. If your deck is centered on stalling and/or burning the opponent, Earthbounds can help stall since they can't be attacked, but if you want to make them count use ones that can be multipurpose. For example, "Earthbound Immortal Aslla piscu" can stall since it can't be attacked, but if your opponent (or you) decides to remove it from the field, it can burn your opponent as well.
If your opponent had an active Field Spell Card, and you activate another Field Spell Card, the Earthbound Immortalwould not be destroyed.If you had an active Field Spell Card, and you activate another Field Spell Card, the original Field Spell Card is destroyed before you place the new Field Spell Card, therefore providing a gap between the time that there is a Field Spell Card, and when there is not. In this scenario, the Earthbound Immortal is destroyed.
It's ok, but its the worst earthbound immortal. It's somewhat weak for this reason: your opponent must have cards in their hand and you must have cards in your spell/trap zones (because you have to get rid of up to 3 spell/traps on your field, and your opponent loses the same amount of cards from their hand, but you cannot toss more cards than what is in your opponents hand. Rasca games 1000 attack x the number of cards you destroyed.)
There can only be 1 "Earthbound Immortal" monster on the field. If there is no face-up Field Spell Card on the field, destroy this card. Your opponent cannot select this card as an attack target. This card can attack your opponent directly. If this face-up card you controlwould be destroyed by battle, you can Tribute 1 other monster you control instead, and halve your opponent's Life Points.
ah, my specialty. Well, that depends. Does your opponent use compulsory evacuation device (i think) when you attack them? Because then the attack is negated. If a player controls one monster, and this monster can't be selected as an attack target, then you may attack directly. So one situation will be if the player has Umi and The Legendary Fisherman, or Guardian Kay'est. These can be ignored, and a direct attack can be made. However - this does not apply if the one monster is an Earthbound Immortal. If a player only controls one monster, and this is an Earthbound Immortal, then he cannot be attacked in the same way, the monster cannot be bypassed, monsters will simply be unable to attack. This is a specifically ruled difference, though without explanation from Konami. If the player controls two unattackable monsters, then again, player and monsters are safe from being attacked. No attacks can be declared against any of them unless circumstances change.
Swords of Revealing Light only flips your opponent's face-down monsters when it resolves. After that, the opponent can Set monsters freely, Swords does not flip them.