If one is hypothetically measuring gravity from a long distance, would there be a delay between the gravity encompassed by a source and the gravity detected from a distance, similarly to how there is a delay in the measurement of light from a distance?
I know that gravity might be independent from time since it is influence by an object's existence. But then again, gravity is a part of space-time.
A long term drought would mean no water for plants (producers), so they would eventually start to die out. The consumers that eat the plants (herbivores or omnivores), would die if they had no other food source.
We don't have a specific measurement. The description just says 'a tall hat.' It would appear to be about 12 to 15 inches.
A man with a knife would win even from a distance of 18 feet away.
Earth Virgo does- not sure of any others. I would love to know
hae my name is Katie brown and i am the biggest fan of zac efron
Nothing, the force of gravity is not affected by Earth's rotation. However measurement of WEIGHT would change.
The ratio of the Earth's gravity to the Sun's gravity is about 0.0006. The Sun's gravity is much stronger than the Earth's gravity because the Sun has a much larger mass. This difference in gravitational force is what keeps the Earth in orbit around the Sun.
Yes. The force of gravity is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between any two masses.
If the separation distance between two masses is halved, the force of gravity between them would increase by a factor of 4. This is because the force of gravity is inversely proportional to the square of the separation distance. Thus, reducing the distance by half would result in the force of gravity increasing by a factor of (1/0.5)^2 = 4.
No, gravity depends on the masses of two objects and the distance between them. The weight of an object is a measure of the gravitational force acting on it, which depends on its mass and the acceleration due to gravity.
Newton's laws of motion still apply on the moon because they are fundamental principles of physics. However, the acceleration due to gravity on the moon is about 1/6th of that on Earth, so objects would weigh less and fall more slowly. This means that the force required to accelerate an object on the moon would be less than on Earth.
That would be distance.
That would be distance.
No, an object's built-in gravity is determined by its mass, not its distance. Gravity depends on the mass of the object causing the gravitational pull, not on the distance between the object and the affected object.
If you were taking distance measurements of a free falling object at one-second intervals, you would observe the object accelerating downward. Each measurement interval would show the object covering a greater distance than the previous interval due to the acceleration from gravity acting on the object.
Yes. I suppose it would be hard to verify through experiment, but there is no specific reason why it shouldn't - basically, it has mass. Even light is affected by gravity.
Is a desirable thing in science.