Most likely, however, you must first determine specifically what it is you're claiming. If your roof has become a victim of simple ageing, I doubt there will be any coverage at all....unless you're paying jolly exorbitant premiums.
If it is damaged due to 'force majure' (an act of God), this may also be excluded, such as in some areas prone to tornadoes or hurricanes or cyclones. This, again, you need to check on your policy. There may be a rider for this specific purpose that you're required to purchase.
If a neighbour's tree falls across their property line and onto your roof, their home owners policy in almost every event would be covered as this is part of the liability coverage.
I'm sorry I can't address specifically as I don't know what type of policy you hold, how old it is, and what the type of claim you're considering based upon which facts.
Your question can be read in a couple of ways. 1. If an occurrence covered by a homeowners policy caused damage to the roof, it probably would be covered. If the occurrence that caused the damage was a type of occurrence covered by the policy, the damage would likely be covered. 2. Conversely, if the roof leaked just because it was old, insurance would not cover repair or replacement because insurance does not cover ordinary wear and tear. 3. If what you mean is whether a new roof (rather than an existing roof) is covered, the rule stated in #1 would apply.
NOPE
No, but if you have a home warranty policy that policy may cover it.
No, Your home insurance policy will not cover normal and expected damages that result from our choice of pet.
It depends on why your roof is leaking. If your roof was damaged by a covered peril such as fire lightning etc. Then your Homeowners insurance would cover the damage. If your roof is old and worn out, it just needs to be replaced and would not be covered by your homeowners insurance. Roofs require the home owners maintenance and upkeep along with replacement every 20 years or so. It's just part of the cost of owning a home. Failure to engage in expected normal maintenance of your home can be interpreted as a moral hazard and can result in cancellation of your homes insurance policy. If your roof is fairly new and you just have a leak with no visible damage, then it is most likely the result of faulty workmanship and again, not covered by your home insurance policy.
homeowners insurance or renters insurance
It just depends on why you have a roof leak. If your roof was damaged by a covered peril such as fire lightning etc. Then your Homeowners insurance would cover the damage. If your roof is old and worn out, it just needs to be replaced and would not be covered by your homeowners insurance. Roofs require the home owners maintenance and upkeep along with replacement every 20 years or so. It's just part of the cost of owning a home. Failure to engage in expected normal maintenance of your home can be interpreted as a moral hazard and can result in cancellation of your homes insurance policy. If your roof is fairly new and you just have a leak with no visible damage, then it is most likely the result of faulty workmanship and again, not covered by your home insurance policy.
Renters Insurance doe snot cover "Real Property". If you have purchased a home then you need a Homeowners Insurance Policy.
If the damage to your front door was the result of a covered peril then yes, it would be covered under your homeowners insurance policy. If the door is just worn out then it is a maintenance issue.
It depends. If you put on a metal roof where you had shingles before and you live in a high hail damage area, the premiums may go up. Typically a new roof will only help, but will not drop the premiums anywhere near the cost of the roof.
No, plus there is a special number you need to call for city or Township approval before digging, they offer insurance to the dig
No. The exception would be, if for instance the snowmobile was stolen off the person's property.