answersLogoWhite

0

England was technologically more advanced than Africa at the time Africans were being enslaved by the English, which was taken as evidence of English racial superiority. It seemed reasonable that superior races should control and be served by inferior races. From our present perspective we can see that even though one culture may advance technologically beyond another, this has to do with many kinds of historical accidents, rather than being a measurement of the capabilities of any ethnicity.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

FranFran
I've made my fair share of mistakes, and if I can help you avoid a few, I'd sure like to try.
Chat with Fran
JordanJordan
Looking for a career mentor? I've seen my fair share of shake-ups.
Chat with Jordan
JudyJudy
Simplicity is my specialty.
Chat with Judy
More answers

English slave owners justified slavery by promoting racist ideologies that asserted the superiority of white people over Black people, claiming that it was their divine duty to civilize and educate those they enslaved. They also argued that slavery was necessary for the economic prosperity of the colonies and that people of African descent were inherently inferior and better off under the control of white slave owners.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

11mo ago
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How did English slave owners justify slavery?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Law

How did southern slave owners view the issue of slavery?

Southern slave owners generally viewed slavery as essential to their economic prosperity, social hierarchy, and way of life. They believed that slavery was a natural and necessary institution, and that it provided the foundation for the region's agricultural economy. Many slave owners also used racism to justify the subjugation of African slaves, considering them inferior beings who needed to be controlled and guided.


What argument used to justify slavery also served to question the fairness of notherners?

The argument used to justify slavery was that it was necessary for the economy and plantation owners relied on slave labor. This argument also served to question the fairness of northerners who benefitted from the goods produced by slave labor in the South, leading to debates about complicity in the institution of slavery.


Did some Southern slave owners defense slavery?

Yes, some Southern slave owners defended slavery as a necessary economic institution to maintain their way of life and argued that it was justified by biblical principles and racial superiority. They believed that slavery was essential for the prosperity of their economy and that it was beneficial for both the enslaved individuals and society as a whole.


Which or these individuals would most likely support the figitive slave act?

Individuals who supported the Fugitive Slave Act were those who believed in upholding the institution of slavery and enforcing laws that allowed slave owners to recapture escaped slaves. Pro-slavery advocates, Southern plantation owners, and politicians who favored preserving the economic and social system of slavery were most likely to support the Fugitive Slave Act.


What did the northerners fear southerners slave owners might do?

Northerners feared that Southern slave owners might expand slavery into new territories and states, potentially increasing the political power of slave states and threatening the balance of power between free and slave states in the United States. They also feared that the economic interests of Southern slave owners would dominate national policies, leading to the spread of slavery in the country.