answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

difference between strategic and traditional training approaches?

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

6mo ago

Strategic training approaches focus on aligning training initiatives with overall business goals and objectives to drive organizational success. Traditional training approaches, on the other hand, tend to be more focused on completing predefined courses or activities without necessarily tying them to strategic outcomes. Strategic training is more proactive and future-oriented, while traditional training may be reactive and task-oriented.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Explain the difference between strategic and traditional training approaches?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Educational Theory

What are the implications of a changing teacher training?

Changing teacher training programs can lead to better prepared educators who are equipped to meet the evolving needs of students. It can also help promote innovative teaching methods and approaches to education. However, it is crucial to ensure that the changes align with the latest research and best practices in pedagogy to maximize their effectiveness.


What is the difference between learning organizations and traditional learning?

In learning organisations,mistakes and errors are seen as learning opportuities-a sign that processes/procedures need to be reviewed/improved,that training may need to be introduced to prevent mistakes being repeated.The emphasis is more on systems than specific individuals seen in isolation.Similarly,positive results can be highlighted as opportunities for imitation by other teams,units,departments etc. In traditional approaches,mistakes are more readily seen as an opportunity to criticise or complain or discipline the guilty party(ies).Sometimes.denial is used to avoid facing painful realities.Consequently,vital lessons are not learned and history may be repeated. In learning organisations,mistakes and errors are seen as learning opportuities-a sign that processes/procedures need to be reviewed/improved,that training may need to be introduced to prevent mistakes being repeated.The emphasis is more on systems than specific individuals seen in isolation.Similarly,positive results can be highlighted as opportunities for imitation by other teams,units,departments etc. In traditional approaches,mistakes are more readily seen as an opportunity to criticise or complain or discipline the guilty party(ies).Sometimes.denial is used to avoid facing painful realities.Consequently,vital lessons are not learned and history may be repeated. In learning organisations,mistakes and errors are seen as learning opportuities-a sign that processes/procedures need to be reviewed/improved,that training may need to be introduced to prevent mistakes being repeated.The emphasis is more on systems than specific individuals seen in isolation.Similarly,positive results can be highlighted as opportunities for imitation by other teams,units,departments etc. In traditional approaches,mistakes are more readily seen as an opportunity to criticise or complain or discipline the guilty party(ies).Sometimes.denial is used to avoid facing painful realities.Consequently,vital lessons are not learned and history may be repeated. In learning organisations,mistakes and errors are seen as learning opportuities-a sign that processes/procedures need to be reviewed/improved,that training may need to be introduced to prevent mistakes being repeated.The emphasis is more on systems than specific individuals seen in isolation.Similarly,positive results can be highlighted as opportunities for imitation by other teams,units,departments etc. In traditional approaches,mistakes are more readily seen as an opportunity to criticise or complain or discipline the guilty party(ies).Sometimes.denial is used to avoid facing painful realities.Consequently,vital lessons are not learned and history may be repeated. In learning organisations,mistakes and errors are seen as learning opportuities-a sign that processes/procedures need to be reviewed/improved,that training may need to be introduced to prevent mistakes being repeated.The emphasis is more on systems than specific individuals seen in isolation.Similarly,positive results can be highlighted as opportunities for imitation by other teams,units,departments etc. In traditional approaches,mistakes are more readily seen as an opportunity to criticise or complain or discipline the guilty party(ies).Sometimes.denial is used to avoid facing painful realities.Consequently,vital lessons are not learned and history may be repeated. In learning organisations,mistakes and errors are seen as learning opportuities-a sign that processes/procedures need to be reviewed/improved,that training may need to be introduced to prevent mistakes being repeated.The emphasis is more on systems than specific individuals seen in isolation.Similarly,positive results can be highlighted as opportunities for imitation by other teams,units,departments etc. In traditional approaches,mistakes are more readily seen as an opportunity to criticise or complain or discipline the guilty party(ies).Sometimes.denial is used to avoid facing painful realities.Consequently,vital lessons are not learned and history may be repeated. In learning organisations,mistakes and errors are seen as learning opportuities-a sign that processes/procedures need to be reviewed/improved,that training may need to be introduced to prevent mistakes being repeated.The emphasis is more on systems than specific individuals seen in isolation.Similarly,positive results can be highlighted as opportunities for imitation by other teams,units,departments etc. In traditional approaches,mistakes are more readily seen as an opportunity to criticise or complain or discipline the guilty party(ies).Sometimes.denial is used to avoid facing painful realities.Consequently,vital lessons are not learned and history may be repeated.


Difference between training and development and different methods of employee training?

Training focuses on teaching specific skills for current job tasks, while development aims to enhance overall capabilities and prepare employees for future roles. Methods of employee training include on-the-job training, classroom training, e-learning, and simulations. Each method has its own benefits and is chosen based on the learning objectives and resources available.


What difference between lecture and training?

A lecture typically involves one-way communication where information is delivered to an audience. Training, on the other hand, is more interactive and hands-on, focusing on teaching specific skills or knowledge through practical activities and exercises. Lectures are more informative, while training is more experiential and skill-oriented.


What are some reasons why on the job training can be ineffective and what can be done to ensure its effectiveness?

First, job training can be ineffective if the people who come to the training are not attentive, create distractions or bring other work to work on while there. Secondly, if the subject of the training is not relevant to the actual job being done, it will be ineffective. The training needs to reflect the actual steps and decision points that the task requires from the worker. Third, the location of the training is important. Desk space, isolation from outside events and noise, room temperature all make a difference. Fourth, provide a take away handout that concisely reflects the training--or email the document for future reference. This should not just be a copy of the power point presentation. Fifth, evaluate the effectiveness of the training by surveying the participants. If you have tried to teach some element of problem solving, having them complete a worksheet and discuss it at the end is a helpful way to wrap up the discussion.

Related questions

What is the difference between linear and dynamic strategic planning?

The difference between linear and dynamic strategic planning lies in their approach to change and adaptability. Linear strategic planning follows a fixed, step-by-step process with clear objectives and a rigid timeline, making it suitable for stable environments. In contrast, dynamic strategic planning is flexible and iterative, allowing for continuous adjustments based on real-time feedback and changing conditions. Dynamic planning is more effective in uncertain or rapidly changing environments. To learn more about these planning approaches and how to apply them, visit PMTrainingSchool .Com (PM training).


Explain the difference between strategic planning and strategic intent?

The difference between strategic planning and strategic intent lies in their focus and scope. Strategic planning involves a structured process of defining an organization's goals, outlining steps, and allocating resources to achieve those goals over a set period. It’s more detailed and tactical. On the other hand, strategic intent refers to the broader vision or long-term aspiration that drives the organization’s actions, focusing on the desired future state. While strategic planning is the roadmap, strategic intent is the destination. For more insights into these concepts, visit PMTrainingSchool .Com (PM training).


Is there a difference between training and teaching?

What is the difference between teaching and training?Improved answer:Training is when you teach people in sports, teaching is more when you teach stuff like maths in school.Teaching is often theoretical with minimal practice. Training is primarily done through practice and repetition.


What is the difference between strategic goals and strategic objectives?

The difference between strategic goals and strategic objectives lies in their scope and specificity. Strategic goals are broad, long-term aims that align with an organization’s vision and mission, providing overall direction. In contrast, strategic objectives are specific, measurable actions that outline how to achieve those broader goals. While goals define "what" the organization wants to accomplish, objectives define "how" and "when" these goals will be met. For a deeper understanding of strategic planning, visit PMTrainingSchool .Com (PM training).


What is the difference between traditional counseling and non traditional counseling?

traditional counseling is an aid or direction which given by the problematic person to their leaders,elderly, parents, husband,wife as well as family and neighbours members in order to cope with the situation. And non traditional counseling was a process of helping or giving advice to individual or group have a problem to cope with the situation through the uses of modern techniques like phones,internent,mass media,debates and different books to assist people who have the problem.


Difference between strategic financial management and financial management?

The difference between strategic financial management and financial management lies in their focus and scope. Financial management primarily involves managing an organization's day-to-day finances, such as budgeting, accounting, and cash flow management. Strategic financial management, on the other hand, focuses on long-term financial planning aligned with the organization’s goals and objectives. It involves making decisions that not only improve current financial performance but also ensure the organization's future financial stability and growth. For expert insights on strategic management concepts, visit PMTrainingSchool .Com (PM training).


What is the difference between strategic planning and operational planning?

The difference between strategic planning and operational planning lies in their focus and timeframe. Strategic planning is long-term and focuses on setting overall goals and direction for an organization, aligning with its mission and vision. It outlines where the organization wants to go in the future. Operational planning, on the other hand, is short-term and focuses on the day-to-day activities needed to achieve the strategic goals. It details specific actions, timelines, and resources required for execution. To learn more about these essential planning processes, visit PMTrainingSchool .Com (PM training).


Why is it necessary to link training and development activities to the achievements of the organization strategic business objectives?

shrak attak


What is high-leverage training?

high leverage training is linked to strategic business goals and objectives,uses an instructional design process to ensure that training is effective, and compares and benchmarks company's training programmes against those of other companies.


What do you mean training is extremely faddish?

The statement that training is extremely faddish means that the material that is being taught to employees doesn't line up with the strategic objectives of the organization.


What is the difference between speed training and endurance training?

endurance training is for strength and speed training is for leg muscle and fat burning


Difference between specific job training and general job training?

distinguish between general and specific training