No there is vitualy no difference between the rate of infection between intact and mutilated.
Yes, twice as many as circumcised.
NO! Some women consider foreskins a major sexual turnoff and are worried about dirt and germs and the possibility of getting sick.
more people on the planet are uncircumcised than circumcised. Therefore more gay men are uncircumcised.
No, being uncircumcised should not affect intercourse in any way.
Indefinitely. Though individual germs may die, the collective colonies will live on!
In some religious beliefs, being uncircumcised is not considered a sin, while in others, it may be seen as a religious requirement or tradition. It ultimately depends on the specific teachings and interpretations of each religion.
Circumcised and uncircumcised penises function exactly the same during sexual intercourse. While uncircumcised men may be slightly more sensitive, it doesn't really matter if a man is circumcised or uncircumcised. There are definite differences and only Intact men can really appreciate these. For more information go to the related link below (Medical studies on circumcision)
At any given time, a human hand may contain as many as 5,000 germs.
There is not a phobia about popcorn, but about germs. Some people are afraid of the germs that may come with sharing a bowl or bucket of popcorn.
Alcohol-free hand sanitizers may not be as effective as alcohol-based ones at killing germs. They may have varying effectiveness against different types of germs, but generally, they are less effective at reducing the microbial load on hands compared to alcohol-based sanitizers.
Possibly
He is uncircumcised
Yes