Three to five days when ONLY being around it a couple of times.
Being around it for a whole week could jeopardize your chances of coming out clean.
Odds are you're more than likely to fail, and drinking water (only massive amounts will it not work. It'll dilate you're urine and they'll have to send it to a lab to have further specimen tests done. That and you can get water intoxication. YES THAT IS REAL), showers and whatever bull you probably hear will not help.
Bleach can kill you.
Vinegar? Sure, video tape it and show me when you're puking your brains out.
THC sticks to your fat cells.
Resource - Wikipedia
"The efficacy of urine testing is debatable due to systematic oxidant not generally available in the classic adulterants category because of its corrosive nature. Stealth is an enzyme system that generates hydrogen peroxide.
There are many reasons that an individual may produce a dilute urine specimen, the majority of which are the result of normal physiological processes (e.g. pregnancy, Diabetes, a diet high in water etc.) specific circumstances, or an individual's personal characteristics (e.g., body type, sex, race, athleticism). Because dilute specimens are relatively common for these reasons, neither the HHS Guidelines nor the U.S. Department of Transportation Procedures for Transportation Workplace Drug and Alcohol Testing Programs permit further processing of negative and dilute specimens. Specific gravity testing can be done to identify whether or not the sample is of dilute nature.
Adulteration tests can detect the use of some of these "detox" products. Adulteration tests analyze the properties of the urine to identify if the sample is abnormal. Such properties include the pH and specific gravity of the urine. They also test the level of creatinine, nitrite, glutaraldehyde, specific gravity, bleach and pyridinium chlorochromate."
Don't be a dumb.
Personally, I've taken at home drug tests and shown up positive for THC from second hand weed smoking. I'm a teen mother and my step-sister smokes and I went to her house a couple times before and later that week showed up VERY positive for THC.
I do not do drugs, drink nor smoke. I love my little girl too much to ever think twice about illegal abuse, besides my father is a police officer. :)
Depending on hos much smoke was arround, 1 to 3 days at the most.
If not doing shotguns,(inhaling do to reverse blowing by another), not long enough to worry. Unless you sit in a room with 5 or more potheads smoking on their own separate stashes at the exact same time...in a very very small closet...on a regular basis. Not very likely...most pot heads that smoke in a closet don't have their own stashes... You'll be fine....relax.....smoke a joint bro....
Can be tested via Hair for up to 3-4 months.
If you drink atleast a bottle of water a day, you can get it out of your system in three days
Probably about 7- 1o days to be on the safe side.
Second hand smoke can lead to the same effects of the actual smoker. There a studies that suggest that it has a worst effect than that of the smoker's; however, these studies have not been extensively researched. In a overview second hand smoke can (Allegedly) cause lung cancer, health problems, and increase your chances of heart attack, stroke, asthma related death, etc.
Seeing as first hand marijuana smoke has no negative side effects, it's second hand smoke is not at all dangerous.
Depending on the potency of the marijuana and the consistency of the second hand smoke, it is possible though.
I dont believe second hand Marijuana does anything bad to the baby when you are pregnant. Second hand smoke from Tobacco is infinitely worse for you than second hand Marijuana.
I'm pretty sure if you inhale enough second hand marijuana smoke, then yes. So be careful.
It can depending on how exposed to it you are. But very unlikely to show up.
Second hand smoke..
Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence: Third Edition This s o r t a says it all These limits generally are based on assessments of health risk and calculations of concentrations that are associated with what the regulators believe to be negligibly small risks. The calculations are made after first identifying the total dose of a chemical that is safe (poses a negligible risk) and then determining the concentration of that chemical in the medium of concern that should not be exceeded if exposed individuals (typically those at the high end of media contact) are not to incur a dose greater than the safe one. So OSHA standards are what is the guideline for what is acceptable ''SAFE LEVELS'' OSHA SAFE LEVELS All this is in a small sealed room 9x20 and must occur in ONE HOUR. For B e n z o [a]p y r e n e, 222,000 cigarettes. "For Acetone, 118,000 cigarettes. "Toluene would require 50,000 packs of simultaneously smoldering cigarettes. Acetaldehyde or Hydrazine, more than 14,000 smokers would need to light up. "For Hydroquinone, "only" 1250 cigarettes. For arsenic 2 million 500,000 smokers at one time. The same number of cigarettes required for the other so called chemicals in s h s / e t s will have the same outcomes. So, OSHA finally makes a statement on s h s / e t s : Field studies of environmental tobacco smoke indicate that under normal conditions, the components in tobacco smoke are diluted below existing Permissible Exposure Levels (PELS.) as referenced in the Air Contaminant Standard (29 CFR 1910.1000)...It would be very rare to find a workplace with so much smoking that any individual PEL would be exceeded." -Letter From Greg Watchman, Acting S e c y, OSHA. Why are their any smoking bans at all they have absolutely no validity to the courts or to science! This pretty well destroys the Myth of second hand smoke: Lungs from pack-a-day smokers safe for transplant, study finds. Using lung transplants from heavy smokers may sound like a cruel joke, but a new study finds that organs taken from people who puffed a pack a day for more than 20 years are likely safe. What's more, the analysis of lung transplant data from the U.S. between 2005 and 2011 confirms what transplant experts say they already know: For some patients on a crowded organ waiting list, lungs from smokers are better than none. "I think people are grateful just to have a shot at getting lungs," said D r S h a r v e n Ta g h a v a cardiovascular surgical resident at Temple University Hospital in Philadelphia, who led the new study........................... I've done the math here and this is how it works out with second hand smoke and people inhaling it! The 16 cities study conducted by the U.S. DEPT OF ENERGY and later by Oakridge National laboratories discovered: Cigarette smoke, bartenders annual exposure to smoke rises, at most, to the equivalent of 6 cigarettes/year. 146,000 CIGARETTES SMOKED IN 20 YEARS AT 1 PACK A DAY. A bartender would have to work in second hand smoke for 2433 years to get an equivalent dose. Then the average non-smoker in a ventilated restaurant for an hour would have to go back and forth each day for 119,000 years to get an equivalent 20 years of smoking a pack a day! Pretty well impossible !
No. The chemicals do not enter your system like they do when you actually smoke it.