RAID 0 does not provide any fault tolerance.
A: raid 0raid 0 is no fault tolerance...coz it writes the data parallely and it doesnot contain any mirror in that.
RAID level 0RAID 0RAID 0 (block-level striping without parity or mirroring) has no (or zero) redundancy. It provides improved performance and additional storage but no fault tolerance. Any drive failure destroys the array, and the likelihood of failure increases with more drives in the array.
1000000000000000000 0000000000000000000 0000000000000000000 00000000000000000000 000000000000000000000 0000000000000000000 ]0000000000000000000000 0000000000000000000000 0000000000000000000000 00000000000000000 00000000000000000000 0000000000000000 000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000 000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000 -0000000000000000000000000 0000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000 0000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000 0000000000000000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000 00000000000000 0 0 0 000 00 0 00 0 00 0 000000 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0 0 00 0 0 0000 0 0000 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 00 0
Find a cave that travels down to [y] of 16 or below. Dig down until you reach floor or [y] of 15. Start Strip Mining. \/ Strip Mining \/ = is Stone. 0 is Air. 0==0==0==0==0==0==0 0==0==0==0==0==0==0 0==0==0==0==0==0==0 0==0==0==0==0==0==0 0==0==0==0==0==0==0 Start Mining like that so you don't miss anything.
#include<stdio.h> #include<stdio.h> #define NUM_ROWS 100 #define NUM_COLS 100 int gol(int h[][NUM_COLS], int row, int col); int main() { int a[NUM_ROWS][NUM_COLS] = { {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, {0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0}, {0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0}, {0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0}, {0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0}, {0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0}, {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0} }; int num_rows= 7; int num_cols = 7; int life_test; life_test = game_of_life(a, num_rows, num_cols); printf ("%d", &life_test); return 0; } int gol(int h[][NUM_COLS], int row, int col) { int i, j; int a=5; for( i = 2; i < row; i++) for( j = 2; j < col; j++) if (h[i][j-1]==0) a++; else if (h[i-1][j-1]==0) a++; else if(h[i-1][j]==0) a++; else if (h[i-1][j+1])==0) a++; { if (a==4) h[i][j]= 1; else h[i][j]=0; } return h[i][j]; }
Windows XP supports spanned and striped RAID 0 volumes Hardware RAID is considered a better solution for fault tolerance than software RAID RAID 0 does not provide fault tolerance
A: raid 0raid 0 is no fault tolerance...coz it writes the data parallely and it doesnot contain any mirror in that.
RAID 0 does not provide fault tolerance, it's to use space form two or more physical disks and increases the disk space available for a single volume. (pg 406)
RAID 0 is "Stripping" and RAID1 is "Mirroring". RAID0 doesn't provide fault tolerance but RAID1 does provide fault tolerance because it has a every disk has a mirrored disk so that in case of disk failure the other disk can be used.
RAID 1, RAID 0+1, RAID 5 and 6.
Fault tolerance is the ability of a system to continue working even when a fault exists. In the case of RAID, which stands for Redundant Array of Inexpensive Discs, fault tolerance is provided by having data recorded on more than one drive, and also by having more than one power supply. Note that RAID 0 is not fault telerant because it is simply stripes the data to increase size and bandwidth, but provides no redundancy. RAID 1 and RAID 5 are fault tolerant, to various levels.
RAID 0
RAID 6 provides the most fault tolerance of any standard RAID disk arrays (RAID 0, 1 , 5, 6, and RAID 10). If any two disks in a RAID 6 array fail and are removed, then two new blank disks can be installed and no data has been lost. RAID 1+1 or most other "layered" RAID systems can provide more fault tolerance than RAID 6, tolerating the failure of any 3 disks. Some experimental non-standard disk arrays can provide more fault tolerance with less overhead, such as the parchive system. Nearly all distributed file systems and distributed version control systems can be set up so that if one machine is completely destroyed by fire, all the data can be recovered from a backup machine in another building.
RAID 0 uses striping without fault tolerance. In RAID 0, data is split across multiple disks, enhancing performance and storage capacity, but it offers no redundancy; if one disk fails, all data is lost. This configuration is typically used in scenarios where speed is prioritized over data safety.
Every RAID level stripes data across multiple drives, which improves performance compared to using a single disk. RAID 0, RAID 1, RAID 1+0, RAID 5, RAID 6, etc. all have better performance than a single disk. Other than RAID 0, all other RAID levels provide fault tolerance. RAID 1, RAID 1+0, RAID 5, RAID 6, etc. all have fault tolerance.
RAID level 0RAID 0RAID 0 (block-level striping without parity or mirroring) has no (or zero) redundancy. It provides improved performance and additional storage but no fault tolerance. Any drive failure destroys the array, and the likelihood of failure increases with more drives in the array.
Different RAID systems have different effects on multiple hard drives. RAID 0 combines storage together. Say you have 2 250GB HDDs combined with RAID 0: that you gives you, essentially, 500GB of storage. The problem with RAID 0 is that if one of the drives were to fail, then the other is to fail too, because of the way RAID 0 works by distributing strands of data over both disks. RAID 0 is sometimes not considered to be a true RAID system because of the lack of fault tolerance. RAID 1 and 5 are more complex to describe, but they generally deal with the same thing: backups. Instead of combining storage, RAID 1 and 5 deal with clones of a particular drive to offer redundancy if one were to fail. Say you have 2 250GB HDDs under RAID 1, essentially giving you 250GB of storage. If one drive were to fail, then the other would serve as a replacement if such were to occur.