0
According to the effects of Slifer the Sky Dragon given in Yu-Gi-Oh! 5D's World Championship 2010: Reverse of Arcadia, Bottomless Trap Hole may not be activated when it is Tribute Summoned onto the field. It clearly states that "...when this card is Normal Summoned, the effects of Spell, Trap, and Effect Monster Cards cannot be activated..."
Slifer the Sky Dragon can be destroyed afterwards by cards that do not target it, such as Mirror Force, or Widespread Ruin.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Slifer the sky dragon Vs bottomless trap hole?
The current game-legal text for Slifer the Sky Dragon says "When Normal Summoned, cards or effects cannot be activated" This prevents the activation of Bottomless Trap Hole in response to Slifer's Normal summon. However this is only for Normal Summon. Slifer can be Special Summoned, and if Special Summoned, then his continuous effect will apply as normal, before cards that respond to summons can be activated. That means if he is special summoned, and his ATK goes to 2000, the summon can be responded to by Bottomless Trap Hole, he will be destroyed and removed.
'Tyrant Dragon' vs 'Bottomless Trap Hole'?
Bottomless Trap Hole does not target, so Tyrant Dragon is unable to negate it.
Can stardust dragon destroy any spell or trap?
Only those that specifically say they destroy a card(s) on the field. Stardust can negate cards such as Mirror Force, Heavy Storm, Bottomless Trap Hole, Crush Card Virus (if it would destroy at least one monster), Mystical Space Typhoon, .... It can't negate cards such as Giant Trunade, Compulsory Evacuation Device, Dimensional Prison, D.D. Assailant, Reinforcements of the Army, ...
Which is better - Trap Hole or Bottomless Trap Hole?
It depends on the circumstances. Generally, "Bottomless Trap Hole" will be the better card; it works on Special Summons and it removes the monster it destroys from play. However, "Trap Hole" has one advantage: the monster summoned only needs 1000 ATK to trigger it, whereas "Bottomless Trap Hole" requires at least 1500 ATK. So, it would depend upon the type of deck you planned to use or went up against, but most people would choose "Bottomless Trap Hole".
Which is better Trap Hole or Bottomless Trap Hole?
"Botttomless Trap Hole" is typically viewed as being better than "Trap Hole" since the destroyed monster in banished/removed from play. A majority of cards function off of cards in the Graveyard or even activate in the Graveyard, so banishing the monster would be more disruptive. That being said, "Trap Hole" can destroy monsters with an ATK under 1500 unlike its "Bottomless" counterpart. Plus there are a few monsters like "D.D. Survivor" that function better when removed from play.
Slifer the sky dragon Vs bottomless trap hole?
The current game-legal text for Slifer the Sky Dragon says "When Normal Summoned, cards or effects cannot be activated" This prevents the activation of Bottomless Trap Hole in response to Slifer's Normal summon. However this is only for Normal Summon. Slifer can be Special Summoned, and if Special Summoned, then his continuous effect will apply as normal, before cards that respond to summons can be activated. That means if he is special summoned, and his ATK goes to 2000, the summon can be responded to by Bottomless Trap Hole, he will be destroyed and removed.
'Tyrant Dragon' vs 'Bottomless Trap Hole'?
Bottomless Trap Hole does not target, so Tyrant Dragon is unable to negate it.
Can Stardust Dragon negate a Bottomless Trap Hole targeting it in Yu-Gi-Oh?
Bottomless Trap Hole does not target due to the way it can remove multiple monsters. If Bottomless Trap Hole is activated, then Stardust Dragon can be used against it, even if Bottomless Trap Hole was activated in response to Stardust Dragon's own summon.
Can 'Bottomless Trap Hole' remove from play 'Stardust Dragon'?
Yes, it can. However Bottomless Trap Hole is a card that destroys, so Stardust Dragon can be used to negate it, even if it was used in response to Stardust Dragon's own summon. The Bottomless Trap Hole will be negated and destroyed in that case.
Can you bottomless trap hole stardust dragon assault mode after its affect brings it back from the grave?
Yes, you can, it is a special summon and can be responded to as normal. However it is more than likely that the monster's controller will simply tribute it to negate and destroy Bottomless Trap Hole, then resummon the dragon in the same end phase.
Is 'Stardust Dragon' affected by 'Bottomless Trap Hole' in Yu-Gi-Oh?
Bottomless Trap Hole destroys monsters as well as removing them, meaning Stardust Dragon can chain to and negate it.
Can you use 'Bottomless Trap Hole' on 'Obsidian dragon'?
Obsidian Dragon only negates S/T cards that 'target' one Dark monster on the field. Bottomless Trap Hole does not target, Obisidian Dragon cannot protect against it.
In Yu-Gi-Oh can 'Stardust Dragon' negate 'Bottomless Trap Hole'?
Bottomless Trap Hole destroys the summoned monster as well as removing it, meaning that Stardust Dragon can tribute itself to chain its negating Quick Effect to BTH's activation. This negation effect will resolve, negating and destroying Bottomless Trap Hole. Then in the end phase, Stardust Dragon will summon itself to the field.
If your opponent special summons 'Red-Eyes Darkness Metal Dragon' and special summons a 'Blue-Eyes White Dragon' and you activate 'Bottomless Trap Hole' are they both removed?
It depends how they are summoned. Bottomless Trap Hole can remove multiple monsters, but only when summoned by the same source. If a player used Monster Reborn and chained Call of the Haunted, then both will resolve, summoning the two monsters. However Bottomless Trap Hole can only be used against the one that was summoned last. If both were summoned simultaneously, by, say, Flute of Summoning Dragon, then Bottomless Trap Hole can respond to this one source of special summon after resolution, to destroy and remove both monsters. One other situation is the player summons the Red-Eyes Darkness Metal Dragon, and then uses its effect to summon a Blue-Eyes. You could chain BTH to Red-Eyes Darkness Metal Dragon's effect activation, you will destroy and remove it, but the Blue-Eyes will still be summoned after. Or, you could allow the Blue-Eyes to be summoned first, and respond to that summon, destroying and removing Blue-Eyes. But because both monsters are summoned from different sources, you will not be able to destroy and remove them both.
What is a sentence for bottomless?
there was a bottomless hole of dirt and bugs
Can you remove the dragon from play the turn you summon it for red eyes darkness metal dragon?
Yes because red eyes is a special summon. But if the bottomless trap hole you can't call priority on the summon of red eyes but if they bottomless redeyed you can call priority and special summon a dragon
I have this card called tiger dragon.. his effect is when i sacrifice a dragon monster for this card i can destroy 2 spell or traps on the field.. would bottomless traphole kill it before the effect?
As a Trigger, Tiger Dragon's effect will go on the chain first before anything else can be used, assuming the summon was not negated. Cards like Bottomless Trap Hole will be chained to it. Even though BTH resolves first and destroys the Tiger Dragon, this does not stop his effect from resolving and destroying the two targets.
