Mostly because they could get big sponsors ship deals for example matel and all the Action Figures they produce for them.
also many companies mostly companies focusing on childen products would not buy commericals time. the more people you have wanting to buy commercial time the more you can charge
also anther factor was during the time it changed the owners wife was running for a political election and as not t get slamme on the campaign they made it more family value oriented
not to mention the wwe former wwf has almost always been pg for its 50 plus year history. the only time it wasntwas for a few years inthe 90s early 2000s when they had strong competiton that was offering a more muture style and was winning in getting money now there is no competiton or at very least lack of competition and they are making tons of money there is no need to change a busines modell that worked for them 45 years out he 50.
it be like mcdonalds announcing tomorrow that they are becoming a fine dining establishment and charging 100 per plate
its just smart business for them
Chat with our AI personalities
Rated R and NC-17 is worst than PG or PG 13 combined.
The movie is rated PG-13 because they are trying to say that the content might be innapropreate for kings 13 and under so teens that are 13 and up can only go see the movie.
yes it is rated PG-13, but i cannot find why
No. Smackdown has always been PG since its inception and RAW turned PG quite recently. One of WWE's greatest selling points is that all of their programs are HD and are "family friendly" However it could be argued that WWE is turning more TV14 with the use of stronger language yet there are still various factors that have not come back (e.g. blood, chair shots to head, bra & panties matches etc.)
it is rated pg-13.