U.S.A has a great army. Europe has a great weapons industry.The weapons in Europe are more powerful.But the U.S. would probably take weapon factories. The U.S. has a better chance, but Europe also might win.
Probably the U.S., but since we are allies with the most powerful nations in Europe (not including Russia, who is very sketchy) that will probably never happen. The U.S., would only stand resistance fron the U.K. France, Germany, Italy, Russia (if we are considering them Europe and not Asia), and Spain (who usually remains neutral), plus the U.S. still has far superior technology and Europe does not at all have better weapons, maybe more, but not better.
If Europe was a single country it would be the most powerful in the world. The combination of British special forces and navy, French air force and navy, and German weapons industries along with other countries like Spain and Italy could defeat the US.
Chat with our AI personalities
The Politics Of Peace And War In Europe At The Time (Apex)
Makarov is a Millitary officer/Terrorist who appears in Modern Warfare 2. He is payed by General Shepeard to start a war between USA and Russia so attacks the Zakhaev International airport. more info go to: http:/callofdutyzperiodzwikiazperiodzcom/wiki/Vladimir_Makarov
Who might win a possible WW3 is open to question. It would depend largely on who was in the war. Many people have assumed and built doctrines and written books on a coming war between the United States and Soviet Union. Now there is no more Soviet Union, so commonly held theories about WW3 have to be abandoned. A full nuclear war called WW3 would have no winner. There would be only a big loser and a bigger loser. A 'limited' nuclear WW3 might have one nation dominant afterward, but most likely that nation would be one that was not party to the conflict. In that case, the world might be run by (for example) Brazil or India after a major war.
Yes, between padme and anakin a little
The politicsof peace and war in europe at the time (apex)