Who might win a possible WW3 is open to question. It would depend largely on who was in the war. Many people have assumed and built doctrines and written books on a coming war between the United States and Soviet Union. Now there is no more Soviet Union, so commonly held theories about WW3 have to be abandoned.
A full nuclear war called WW3 would have no winner. There would be only a big loser and a bigger loser. A 'limited' nuclear WW3 might have one nation dominant afterward, but most likely that nation would be one that was not party to the conflict. In that case, the world might be run by (for example) Brazil or India after a major war.
The elephant would win.
obviously army to army Persians would win by tactics but one to one a barbarian would win
raiden would win
Brock Leasnar would win
John cena would win in a fist fight an 50 cent would win in a in a gun fight
USA team.
Today's "Global War on Terrorism" is considered by many, to be WW3.
so that when ww3 happened it would be easier to win
terror would be everywhere and we would have ww3 :( terror would be everywhere and we would have ww3 :(
Well it is quite possible for America to start ww3 and win I mean with all there allies such as England Australia New Zealand and all the rest I mean America is disputably the most powerful nation in the world.
there was no ww3 that is just in a video game
ww3 hasnt happened. but it is inevitable
im not sure but there was no WW3
Well I think it would have to be eather Russia or America
There hasn't been a WW3.
Afghanistan is not considered part of WW3...there is popular references that WW3 is gonna happen, but it is definitely not considered a WW3.^_^
We haven't had WW3 yet. Let's hope we don't.