Economic development would get rid of the need for slavery
Economic development would get rid of the need for slavery (APEX)
No, arguments can either be strong or weak, however, a valid argument would be considered a sound argument. The opposite would be an invalid argument.
Brook means to put up with, or tolerate, so the whole thing means it doesn't have to to put up with any argument.
Begin developing a historical argument to answer the historical question
nalga
Economic development would get rid of the need for slavery (APEX)
Economic development would get rid of the need for slavery (APEX)
Opposed slavery
The whigs from the North were known as Conscience Whigs and those of the South were known as Cotton Whigs. The ones in the north opposed slavery except for the factory owners, which liked slavery die to the cheap cotton. the Southern Whigs supported slavery and wished to expand it into the territories.
Northern Whigs became Republicans, Southern Whigs became Democrats
northern whigs and free soldiers
northern whigs
Whigs
The northern and southern Whigs split apart in the 1850s primarily due to deepening divisions over the issue of slavery. Northern Whigs, increasingly opposed to the expansion of slavery into new territories, aligned with the anti-slavery movement, while southern Whigs sought to protect and promote the institution of slavery. Compounding these tensions were debates over the Kansas-Nebraska Act and the rise of the Republican Party, which further polarized the Whig Party. Ultimately, these ideological differences led to the party's collapse and the emergence of new political alignments.
Whigs, Democratic's, and some northern Democrats.
the whigs and democrats embraced the idea of popular sovereignty
State governments could not do the job well on their own.