The strong points in The Hunger Games for the Capitol and the people of the Capitol is that it provides entertainment to them as well as keeping the districts in line so they do not rebel again. It shows the Capitol's power towards the people of Panem and that the Capitol is not a force to be reckoned with. The weak point of the games is that it can be outsmarted by creativity such as when Katniss and Peeta pull out the berries to defy the Capitol and give them two winners of no winner or even when Haymitch ducked which made the axe thrown by the district 2 tribute rebound and kill her instead.
Chat with our AI personalities
Katniss is independent, headstrong and able to overcome hardships. She is also a bit socially inadequate, and doesn't quite get social cues like affection. Katniss is very strong when it comes to physical problems.
Small Enclosed spaces (he has claustrophobia)
duple meter
No, arguments can either be strong or weak, however, a valid argument would be considered a sound argument. The opposite would be an invalid argument.
In the 25th Hunger Games, the tributes were voted into place by the people of their own district.In the 50th Hunger Games, four tributes were chosen from each district instead of the usual two. This put twice as many people in the arena, and made it twice as brutal. Haymitch Abernathy won in the second Quarter Quell.The 75th Hunger Games had past victors from earlier Hunger Games compete for a second time. This action was made to destroy any bonds the districts had with each other and to make them feel weak. It was meant to be a reminder to the citizens of the districts that "even the strongest among them cannot overcome the power of the Capitol".