answersLogoWhite

0

It depends what do you understand by a "bad" person. Usually a public man can't be measured by "normal" categories. Abraham Lincoln was a marvelous person, but the war that divided the United States was probably the most terrible isue in the history of the Country. Batista was a self-made person. He was as poor as it could be, his father never gave him his name. He became a president and was derrocated by a revolution lidered by a man born rich. Batista had black ascendents. Castro was the son of a white spaniard. United States denied Batista arms to fight the comunist revolution and never permitted Batista to live in this Country after he was derrocated, even when he had a house hear, but permitted that arms a men were sent to Castro's guerrilla. Perhaps because Batista was a mulatto and Castro white? Who knows?

User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

DevinDevin
I've poured enough drinks to know that people don't always want advice—they just want to talk.
Chat with Devin
FranFran
I've made my fair share of mistakes, and if I can help you avoid a few, I'd sure like to try.
Chat with Fran
SteveSteve
Knowledge is a journey, you know? We'll get there.
Chat with Steve

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Was fulgencio batista a bad person?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp