A car in reverse is almost always at fault if it gets in a collision, unless you can prove that the other vehichle was driving recklessly.
hopefully, car drivers 2 and 3 have the same insurance supplier. if they dont , TOUGH LUCK, LIFE ISNT FAIR
Most likely it is the other person's fault. You were not moving and therefore cannot do anything to avoid the accident. The other party is the only one that could take any action to prohibit the collision.
It is the fault of the person who fell.
The one who hits the other in the rear end is at fault, no matter if the person in front of them has working lights are not, because by law they will say you were following to close and should of had enough distance between you and the other car to avoid the collision.
Because of Brian.
culpable
any device in the collision domain whose backoff timer expires first
Imperial Germany and the Kaiser Wilhelm
Barring any exclusions in the policy, the insurance 'stays with the car' so your insurance will pay for the damage to the innocent persons vehicle (under your liablity coverage). If you have collison coverage on your vehicle/policy it too will pay to repair your vehicle less the deductible. If there is no collision coverage on your vehicle and the driver has a policy with collision coverage the drivers collision coverage may step in and repair your vehicle, but ONLY if you don't have collision coverage.
Are you hoping to be able to go to court and say "WikiAnswers says it wasn't my fault."? No such luck. If he was on the main road and you entered from a side road or driveway, it's almost certainly your fault whether you saw him or not, unless you were a significant distance from the intersection before the collision.
This is a tough one. Usually a rear end collision is the vehicle in the backs fault. If the accident occurred at night and the towed car had no lights to see them you may not be at fault. Call your insurance company to find out what their opinion is.