The person who causes the accident is at fault
The person pulling out of the driveway is at fault.
The San Andreas fault is a transform fault, meaning that two plates are sliding pas one another. This sort of movement does not force magma toward the surface.
The person who ran the stop sign is at fault
In Ontario parking lots are private property and do not fall under the highway traffic act. Given this Ontario also has whats called no-fault insurance, meaning if 2 people are in an accident in a parking lot, person 1's insurance covers person 1 and person 2's insurance covers person 2. If there are evidence who can mention who was in fault while accident happens, then only you can decide on this. But if your car hit another parked car or vice-verse then you should be in fault. When I face same problem, my insurance company Chola MS favored me as my car was parked in parking lot and someone rushed into my car.
First, Are you the uninsured driver or the person who was rear-ended? It doesn't matter which party is asking, or that the highway was in Alabama either. The driver who rear-ends another car at a red light is at fault 99.9+ percent of the time. But the other driver cannot ORDER him to pay, unless he happens to also be the presiding judge who hears the lawsuit (maybe Alabama does matter, after all).
The person who hit a parked vehicle is at fault.
A Narcissist NEVER makes any mistakes. It is always the fault of another person is done TO him not BY HIM so that he will look to be at fault.
A person who is at fault is commonly referred to as the "responsible party" or the "party at fault."
You are! For not being cautious when reversing on to a road. You should make sure that it is safe and clear when reversing, if you hit another car it is your fault and not the person that is driving on the roads fault.
The car that was in the hidden driveway.
If a person suffers damage due to a tort that is partly their own fault and partly the fault of another, it is called "comparative negligence" or "contributory negligence," depending on the jurisdiction. In comparative negligence, the damages awarded may be reduced in proportion to the individual's share of the fault. Contributory negligence, on the other hand, may bar recovery entirely if the injured party is found to be even slightly at fault.