Assuming that you are referring to liability insurance, the general answer, subject to the law of the jurisdiction, is "Yes". This presumes the legal, provable damages exceed the policy limits, rather than a claim made at the "I want" stage of things.
A factor that is important to remember is that a liability insurer has an obligation to resolve a claim on behalf of an insured within the policy limits if it is all possible to do so. This generally translates into a scenario where, if the claimed damages may reasonably be expected to exceed policy limits (for example, if the case goes to a jury), but the claimant is willing to accept policy limits in full settlement and release the insured from further liability, the insurer has an obligation to settle within limits. By so doing, it is protecting the insured from individual liability for an "excess" verdict, and is fulfilling its duty of "good faith".
Many States have statutes (written laws) that provide a process by which an insurer may be held liable for an excess verdict. If it is shown that the insurer did not act in good faith by settling within policy limits when it had the opportunity to do so, the insurer may be held responsible for amounts in excess of its policy limits. Those amounts may include the full amount of the verdict, damages to the insured that proximately flowed from having the excess verdict/judgment entered (such as damage to credit), attorney's fees, and depending upon the jurisdiction, other categories of damages.
The driver who hit the pedestrian is liable, not their insurance company. The drivers insurance company will normally be responsible for payment of valid claims up to the policy limits for which the their insured driver is found liable.
If you only carry liability insurance, that is all that the insurance company is liable for in this state.
Your financially liable for all damages and associated losses. Whatever that amount happens to be. Your insurance policy will pay up to it's policy limits.
The owner of the car is liable for the accident itself and the damage. However, the insurance company might have to pay for it, depending on the owners insurance cover.
No, a co signor would not be liable. A co-buyer would be liable.
The driver's insurance would then be considered "secondary," meaning if the owner of the auto didn't have insurance, then if the person driving the car had insurance, they would be liable.
You are liable to pay for the damages on your property because of your lack of insurance.
If someone causes damages to your property, they are liable. This means, however that you have to deal with their insurance company directly, rather then your insurance company doing it for you.
The owner of the vehicle please the people on the insurance policy are liable.
The "Liability" section of an insurance policy is typically responsible for providing compensation for injury or damage to property. This section outlines the coverage and limits for which the insurance company will be liable in case of a covered loss.
If your policy limit is 300k then the insurance company will pay them that portion and you will be liable for the rest. If you really want to cover yourself for more than those limits, I would purchase an umbrella type policy that covers over the policy limits.
You are "liable" for any contract that you signed. You need to review the contract to determine the nature and limits of your liability.