A home owner is responsible for damages caused by trees growing on his property, even if they fall outside his property line.
It depends on whether or not the car carried comprehensive insurance. If it did the auto owner's insurance would cover the tree damage, regardless of the cause. If the car did not have comp. coverage, then the car owner may be able to make a liability claim against the tree owner's homeowners insurance coverage. If the homeowner's insurance denies the claim, the car owner can still seek a civil award against the homeowner's personal assets.
NO. A property owner is not responsible for acts of nature.
No, That's what Auto Insurance is for.
No, I'm afraid not. Homeowners insurance never covers a vehicle. That's what auto insurance is for
Depends on the car and how you are crushing it.
tell someone so they cam move it
Mother Nature would be the "responsible" party. The homeowner is not "liable" for acts of nature. Your homeowners insurance is not responsible for a natural act that causes damage to property of another. Your neighbors car is not listed as covered property on your Homeowners policy. Your homeowners insurance would also not pay if the tree fell on your own automobile. If a tree falls on someones car they should file a loss claim with their Auto Insurance Company. If they have comprehensive coverage then it will take care of their loss.
By preventing the car crushing the occupants of the car.
Neither homeowner's insurance will probably cover property stolen from a car. Homeowner's insurance usually only covers stuff stolen from your home. However, the automobile insurance policy might cover it.
In the car crushing yard
No, homeowners insurance does not provide coverage for automobiles. The vehicle owner will need to file a claim on the comprehensive portion of their automobile insurance