the insurance of the owners car would have to be liable. basically, your not gonna get sh*t cus driving with no license or insurance automatically makes you At Fault--regardless of who really in all actuality was. DONT DRIVE WITH NO INSURANCE.
You should get in trouble because you caused the accident.
Most cases you get jailed if the accident is severe. If its not too much you get a ticket for driving without licensed driver. Depends on country to country though
Liability of Uninsured Drivers in the USA.The at fault driver is always the primary person liable for damages from any accident they cause whether licensed, insured or not. Licensed status does not negate liability. In the U.S. both the at fault driver and the registered vehicle owner can be held financially liable. If no nsurance is avalable, you owe personally for all the damages and may have some fines to pay as well.Happy MotoringWrong Answer for USA, Perhaps valid in some other countriesIf an unlicensed driver is involved in a automobile accident, they are, by default, responsible due to the fact that they are not legally operating a vehicle. Their presence on the road is considered the first in the chain of events that lead to the accident. AnswerDepending on how serious injuries were, if any, this type of crime carries about the same weight as Driving while intoxicated. You will probably do jail time and if you ever get licensed will need an SR-22 slip often. AnswerWould you please provide me with the supporting legislation, rule or other that substantiates this. My son was involved in an accident with an unlicensed driver and the State of NJ Department of Insurance and Banking had no idea what I was talking about when I mentioned David Adam's answer which read, "If an unlicensed driver is involved in a automobile accident, they are, by default, responsible due to the fact that they are not legally operating a vehicle. There presence on the road is considered the first in the chain of events that lead to the accident."
Someone who is not licensed.
yes , just because they are not licensed or insured does not mean they cannot be an owner/ jt owner of a vehicle , however if they are an operator they obviously must be licensed and should be insured.the former not being a valid reason to raise your premiums since they are not a licensed operator
No, an unlicensed rider can not operate a jet ski even with a licensed rider on the back.
The rules and laws of insurance vary from state to state but generally speaking it is the automobile that is insured not the driver. So if your friend allows you to drive her insured car and you are involved in an accident you are covered under her policy(((IF her insurance policy does not stipulate restrictions banning unlicensed drivers from operating the vehicle))) in which case her insurance may not cover damages done to her vehicle or injuries to the unlicensed driver.
A licensed professional can employ an unlicensed agent to perform professional actions.
It is important to understand the insurance policy that is purchased on a drivers car. The only way that an uninsured driver is covered in an insured car is id the owner of the car has that in their policy.
Daycare can be unlicensed or licensed.
You must be licensed to drive, or have a permit and a licensed driver with you. Otherwise, there are legal consequences for that driver. The insurance company may not pay for any damages depending on the policy.
they would be hurt physically, financially and legally! Bad..... very bad! Driver: Jail, Fine, Inability to get a driver's licensed for a number of years, Lawsuit, Potential loss of personal property. Car owner: Lawsuit, Loss of vehicle. Potential loss of personal property. If just a question..... don't do it. If dealing with this...... get a lawyer.