Car X's driver (not president Obama, as much as you want me to say it...)
you. you hit him.
that would be the person that goes into reverse, because as long as you are stopped it is not your fault. the only possible chance of it being your fault is if you are in motion, but even than it would be a technicality that you could be at fault.
It must be the rear brakes at fault.
If the pedestrian illegaly, unexpectedly, and dangerously enters the flow of traffic causing a vehicle operator to swerve their vehicle in order to avoid them.
fr 1 1520
the car that hit you in the rear is at fault. think about it this way. What did you do wrong if you were stopped
it is ALLWAYS your fault for FOLOWING TOO CLOSE TO SAFELY STOP.
If they wern't going backwards when you hit them you are at fault.
no, it is their fault for not letting you know they were stopping.
If you are completely stopped, the person behind you will be at fault for BOTH cars since they didn't allow themselves enough time and space to stop safely.
If he pulled out in front of a car driving on the street and it struck his car, then he is at fault. If he was rear-ended by the car following, then the following driver is at fault.
Yes but it would be beneficial to got to court and tell why the accident happened so the judge can rule fairly on the accident..