Yes. Yes, because it would be considered that you followed too close. Yes yes you would be considered At Fault, being that you must ALWAYS be at a safe distance from other vehicles when behind. (at least 3 car lengths)
The car in the back is usually at fault in a rear end collision. The only exception would be if the car in front were backing up. The car in back is at fault for hitting you ,but if you are pushed into the car in front of you you are at fault for hitting that car.
that would be the person that goes into reverse, because as long as you are stopped it is not your fault. the only possible chance of it being your fault is if you are in motion, but even than it would be a technicality that you could be at fault.
the car that hit you in the rear is at fault. think about it this way. What did you do wrong if you were stopped
If you are completely stopped, the person behind you will be at fault for BOTH cars since they didn't allow themselves enough time and space to stop safely.
If you hit a car from behind, you are going to be held to be at fault. If a car hits you from behind, they are going to be held at fault. Most jurisdictions consider hitting the back of a car prima facia evidence that you were following too closely. You could literally have six cars at fault in this case, each one for hitting the one in front of it.
False!
A stopped car shouldn't hit anything because it's not moving. If a car hits the car behind it must have been in reverse and front ended the vehicle. In that case the car that front ended the vehicle is at fault.
The person who was following too closely to stop before hitting the car ahead.
It sounds like you violated his right of way and turned in front of him. From the limited description, I would ticket the driver turning.
you. you hit him.
It has been my experience that you are at fault if you rear-end the vehicle in front of you, the citation would be "following to close" or something to that effect.
they are at fault because they should have pulled off to the side.