0
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Ezra
Coach
BlakeDeductive reasoning is considered stronger than inductive reasoning because it involves drawing valid conclusions based on premises that guarantee the truth of the conclusion. In deductive reasoning, if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true. This logical certainty is not present in inductive reasoning, where conclusions are based on probabilities and generalizations from specific observations.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why is a deductive reasoning stronger than inductive reasoning?
Deductive reasoning is considered stronger than inductive reasoning because it involves drawing specific conclusions from general principles or premises, leading to definite results. In contrast, inductive reasoning involves making generalizations based on specific observations, leaving room for uncertainty and error in the conclusions drawn. Deductive reasoning follows a more structured and logical process, while inductive reasoning relies more on probabilities and patterns.
Why is inductive reasoning stronger than deductive reasoning?
because it makes assumptions based on supported ideas
Deductive reasoning is stronger than inductive reasoning because it?
draws conclusions based on premises everyone can agree on
Why is deductive reasonin stronger than inductive reasoning?
Deductive reasoning is considered stronger than inductive reasoning because it involves deriving specific conclusions from general principles or premises. This makes the conclusions more certain and reliable, as they logically follow from the given information. Inductive reasoning, on the other hand, involves drawing general conclusions based on specific observations, which can lead to less certain or reliable results.
Inductive reasoning is weaker than deductive reasoning because it?
Inductive reasoning is weaker than deductive reasoning because inductive reasoning is known as bottom-up logic where as deductive reasoning is known as top-down logic.
