0
What else can I help you with?
Why is a deductive reasoning stronger than inductive reasoning?
Deductive reasoning is considered stronger than inductive reasoning because it involves drawing specific conclusions from general principles or premises, leading to definite results. In contrast, inductive reasoning involves making generalizations based on specific observations, leaving room for uncertainty and error in the conclusions drawn. Deductive reasoning follows a more structured and logical process, while inductive reasoning relies more on probabilities and patterns.
Why is inductive reasoning stronger than deductive reasoning?
because it makes assumptions based on supported ideas
Why is deductive reasoning stronger than inductive reasoning?
because it makes assumptions based on supported ideas
Why is deductive reasoning stronger that inductive reasoning?
Deductive reasoning is considered stronger because it involves drawing specific conclusions from general principles or premises that are assumed to be true. In deductive reasoning, if the premises are true and the logic is valid, then the conclusion must also be true. In contrast, inductive reasoning involves drawing general conclusions from specific observations, which makes it more prone to errors and uncertainties.
Why is deductive reasonin stronger than inductive reasoning?
Deductive reasoning is considered stronger than inductive reasoning because it involves deriving specific conclusions from general principles or premises. This makes the conclusions more certain and reliable, as they logically follow from the given information. Inductive reasoning, on the other hand, involves drawing general conclusions based on specific observations, which can lead to less certain or reliable results.
Inductive reasoning is weaker than deductive reasoning because?
Inductive reasoning is weaker than deductive reasoning because inductive reasoning is known as bottom-up logic where as deductive reasoning is known as top-down logic.
Why is a deductive reasoning stronger than inductive reasoning?
Deductive reasoning is considered stronger than inductive reasoning because it involves drawing specific conclusions from general principles or premises, leading to definite results. In contrast, inductive reasoning involves making generalizations based on specific observations, leaving room for uncertainty and error in the conclusions drawn. Deductive reasoning follows a more structured and logical process, while inductive reasoning relies more on probabilities and patterns.
Why is inductive reasoning stronger than deductive reasoning?
because it makes assumptions based on supported ideas
Why is deductive reasoning stronger than inductive reasoning?
because it makes assumptions based on supported ideas
Why is deductive reasoning stronger that inductive reasoning?
Deductive reasoning is considered stronger because it involves drawing specific conclusions from general principles or premises that are assumed to be true. In deductive reasoning, if the premises are true and the logic is valid, then the conclusion must also be true. In contrast, inductive reasoning involves drawing general conclusions from specific observations, which makes it more prone to errors and uncertainties.
Why is deductive reasoning stronger than indeductive reasoning?
Deductive reasoning is considered stronger than inductive reasoning because it provides conclusions that are logically certain, provided the premises are true. In deductive reasoning, if the premises are valid, the conclusion must also be valid, leading to definitive outcomes. In contrast, inductive reasoning draws generalizations based on specific observations, which may lead to probable but not guaranteed conclusions. This inherent uncertainty makes inductive reasoning weaker in terms of certainty.
Why is deductive reasonin stronger than inductive reasoning?
Deductive reasoning is considered stronger than inductive reasoning because it involves deriving specific conclusions from general principles or premises. This makes the conclusions more certain and reliable, as they logically follow from the given information. Inductive reasoning, on the other hand, involves drawing general conclusions based on specific observations, which can lead to less certain or reliable results.
Inductive reasoning is weaker than deductive reasoning because it?
Inductive reasoning is weaker than deductive reasoning because inductive reasoning is known as bottom-up logic where as deductive reasoning is known as top-down logic.
How does inductive reasoning differ from deductive reasoning?
Inductive reasoning involves drawing general conclusions from specific observations or data, while deductive reasoning involves reaching specific conclusions based on general principles or premises. Inductive reasoning is less certain than deductive reasoning because the conclusions are not logically guaranteed by the premises.
Why both inductive and deductive reasoning can be used in maths?
Because both are based on strict rules of logical reasoning.
How is inductive reasoning weaker than deductive reasoning?
Inductive reasoning is weaker than deductive reasoning because it involves making generalizations based on specific observations, which can lead to errors or false conclusions. In contrast, deductive reasoning starts with a general principle or hypothesis and uses it to make specific predictions or draw specific conclusions, which can be more reliable and conclusive when executed correctly.
Why is inductive reasoning a myth?
Inductive reasoning is often considered a myth because it relies on the assumption that past observations can reliably predict future occurrences, which is not always guaranteed. Critics argue that just because something has happened repeatedly does not ensure it will happen again; this is known as the problem of induction. Additionally, the lack of definitive proof in inductive reasoning can lead to false conclusions, highlighting its limitations in establishing absolute truths. Therefore, while useful, inductive reasoning is fundamentally uncertain and cannot provide certainty like deductive reasoning.
