0
What else can I help you with?
Why is a deductive reasoning stronger than inductive reasoning?
Deductive reasoning is considered stronger than inductive reasoning because it involves drawing specific conclusions from general principles or premises, leading to definite results. In contrast, inductive reasoning involves making generalizations based on specific observations, leaving room for uncertainty and error in the conclusions drawn. Deductive reasoning follows a more structured and logical process, while inductive reasoning relies more on probabilities and patterns.
Why is inductive reasoning stronger than deductive reasoning?
because it makes assumptions based on supported ideas
Why is deductive reasoning stronger than inductive reasoning?
because it makes assumptions based on supported ideas
Why is deductive reasoning stronger that inductive reasoning?
Deductive reasoning is considered stronger because it involves drawing specific conclusions from general principles or premises that are assumed to be true. In deductive reasoning, if the premises are true and the logic is valid, then the conclusion must also be true. In contrast, inductive reasoning involves drawing general conclusions from specific observations, which makes it more prone to errors and uncertainties.
Why is deductive reasonin stronger than inductive reasoning?
Deductive reasoning is considered stronger than inductive reasoning because it involves deriving specific conclusions from general principles or premises. This makes the conclusions more certain and reliable, as they logically follow from the given information. Inductive reasoning, on the other hand, involves drawing general conclusions based on specific observations, which can lead to less certain or reliable results.
Inductive reasoning is weaker than deductive reasoning because?
Inductive reasoning is weaker than deductive reasoning because inductive reasoning is known as bottom-up logic where as deductive reasoning is known as top-down logic.
Why is a deductive reasoning stronger than inductive reasoning?
Deductive reasoning is considered stronger than inductive reasoning because it involves drawing specific conclusions from general principles or premises, leading to definite results. In contrast, inductive reasoning involves making generalizations based on specific observations, leaving room for uncertainty and error in the conclusions drawn. Deductive reasoning follows a more structured and logical process, while inductive reasoning relies more on probabilities and patterns.
Why is inductive reasoning stronger than deductive reasoning?
because it makes assumptions based on supported ideas
Why is deductive reasoning stronger than inductive reasoning?
because it makes assumptions based on supported ideas
Why is deductive reasoning stronger that inductive reasoning?
Deductive reasoning is considered stronger because it involves drawing specific conclusions from general principles or premises that are assumed to be true. In deductive reasoning, if the premises are true and the logic is valid, then the conclusion must also be true. In contrast, inductive reasoning involves drawing general conclusions from specific observations, which makes it more prone to errors and uncertainties.
Why is deductive reasonin stronger than inductive reasoning?
Deductive reasoning is considered stronger than inductive reasoning because it involves deriving specific conclusions from general principles or premises. This makes the conclusions more certain and reliable, as they logically follow from the given information. Inductive reasoning, on the other hand, involves drawing general conclusions based on specific observations, which can lead to less certain or reliable results.
Inductive reasoning is weaker than deductive reasoning because it?
Inductive reasoning is weaker than deductive reasoning because inductive reasoning is known as bottom-up logic where as deductive reasoning is known as top-down logic.
How does inductive reasoning differ from deductive reasoning?
Inductive reasoning involves drawing general conclusions from specific observations or data, while deductive reasoning involves reaching specific conclusions based on general principles or premises. Inductive reasoning is less certain than deductive reasoning because the conclusions are not logically guaranteed by the premises.
Why both inductive and deductive reasoning can be used in maths?
Because both are based on strict rules of logical reasoning.
How is inductive reasoning weaker than deductive reasoning?
Inductive reasoning is weaker than deductive reasoning because it involves making generalizations based on specific observations, which can lead to errors or false conclusions. In contrast, deductive reasoning starts with a general principle or hypothesis and uses it to make specific predictions or draw specific conclusions, which can be more reliable and conclusive when executed correctly.
Is deductive reasoning more important than inductive reasoning?
Both are equally important. Inductive reasoning is when one makes a conclusion based on patterns; deductive reasoning is based on a hypothesis already believed to be true. However, deductive reasoning does give a more "solid" conclusion because as long as the hypothesis is true, the conclusion will most likely to be true. An example is saying that all dogs are big; Harry is a dog, so it must be big. Since the hypothesis all dogs are big is false, Harry may not necessarily be big. If I change my hypothesis to be all dogs are mammals, thus concluding that Harry is a mammal since it is a dog, I would be correct, for I changed my hypothesis to a true fact. Using inductive reasoning, on the other hand, may result in a false conclusion. For example, since I am a human and I have brown hair, one could use inductive reasoning to say all humans have brown hair, which would be false. So, to sum it up, both inductive and deductive reasoning are important, but deductive reasoning is usually more reliable since as long as the hypothesis one's conclusion is based on is true, the conclusion itself will usually be true.
What is the difference between the inductive and deductive method of enquiry?
In general, deductive logic takes a lot of information and tries to draw a conclusion from it. Inductive logic takes one piece of information and tries to generalize from there. That doesn't necessarily make one better than another... they are each important in different circumstances. In general science for instance, deductive logic is used most often. If you have a lot of observations, you might be able to figure out more about the subject of study. In interpersonal relationships, on the other hand, inductive logic is used most often. If one person reacts a certain way, then they figure that some other people will too. Both contribute to understanding, but are usually used very differently. I would also suggest looking up the terms in an online dictionary or encyclopedia, especially if you are asking about formal definitions.
