answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer
User Avatar

Godfrey Smitham

Lvl 13
2y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Stefanie Little

Lvl 10
3y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Araceli Klocko

Lvl 10
3y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Baby DuBuque

Lvl 13
2y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

AnswerBot

7mo ago

Plantation owners preferred slaves over indentured servants because slaves provided a lifetime of unpaid labor, while indentured servants only served for a limited time. Slaves were also seen as property that could be inherited and sold, providing long-term economic benefits to plantation owners. Additionally, slaves were seen as a more controllable and permanent labor force compared to indentured servants, who had the possibility of earning their freedom.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago

Slaves were property and were not free to leave the plantation, but an indentured servant was a free white person who signed a 7 year contract. Indentured servitude often was not completed and since they were white they could fade into the population while any African American was a slave no matter where he/she was. They needed permission to leave the plantation.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

The childern of female slaves didn't need to be bought. -apex

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why would plantation owner prefer slaves instead of indentured servants?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What would plantation owners prefer slaves instead of indentured servants?

they coulld use slaves longer


Why would plantation owners prefer slaves instead of the indentured servants?

Plantation owners preferred slaves over indentured servants because slaves were considered lifelong property with no legal rights or protections, ensuring a cheap and permanent labor force. Slaves also provided a better return on investment over time compared to indentured servants, who were temporary and could eventually gain freedom and become competition in the labor market.


Why did plantation owners prefer slaves then indentured servants?

Plantation owners preferred slaves over indentured servants because slaves were considered property for life, providing a long-term and inexpensive source of labor. Indentured servants, on the other hand, only worked for a fixed period and were entitled to freedom and land after their contract ended, making them less profitable for plantation owners in the long run.


Why would plantation owners prefer slaves instead of indentured slaves?

The children of female slaves didn't need to be bought.


Why do plantation owners prefer to have slaves rather then indentured servants?

Plantation owners preferred slaves over indentured servants because slaves were considered property and could be bought, sold, and inherited, providing a more permanent and stable labor force. Slaves were also seen as a lifetime investment whereas indentured servants were temporary workers whose contracts would expire. Additionally, slaves were often treated as less than human and did not have legal rights or protections, allowing plantation owners to exert complete control over them.


Why would a landowner rather use instead of indentured servants?

A landowner might prefer to use wage laborers instead of indentured servants because wage laborers provide more flexibility and control over the workforce. With wage laborers, the landowner can hire and fire workers as needed without being bound by the terms of a contract like with indentured servants. Additionally, wage laborers may have more experience and skills that can benefit the operations of the landowner.


Why did plantation owners prefer African slaves to indentured servants?

Plantation owners preferred African slaves over indentured servants because slaves were seen as a more permanent and cost-effective labor source. Slaves were considered property for life, providing long-term labor stability, while indentured servants worked for a defined period before gaining freedom. Additionally, racial prejudices and laws made it easier to control and subjugate African slaves compared to European indentured servants.


Why would plantation owners prefer slaves instead if indentured servants?

Plantation owners preferred slaves over indentured servants because slaves were considered property and could be owned for life, providing a more permanent and reliable source of labor. Slaves were also seen as a more cost-effective solution as owners did not have to pay them wages or provide for their care after they were no longer able to work. Additionally, the system of slavery was deeply entrenched in the colonial economy and society, providing a consistent supply of labor that could be controlled and exploited without legal protections for the enslaved individuals.


Why did plantation owners MOST prefer to use slaves over indentured servants?

Plantation owners preferred using slaves over indentured servants because slaves were perceived as a lifetime investment, as they were considered property that could be bought and sold. Slaves were also viewed as a more long-term and reliable labor force, as they had fewer legal rights and were enslaved for life, unlike indentured servants who would be freed after a set period of time. Slaves were also often seen as easier to control and exploit due to their lack of legal protections.


Which would owners of large plantations rather have slaves than indentured servants?

Owners of large plantations would prefer slaves over indentured servants because slaves could be owned for life and were considered property, providing greater control and ensuring a continuous source of cheap labor. Indentured servants had limited terms of service and some legal protections, making them less profitable and reliable for long-term agricultural work. Furthermore, slaves were seen as a permanent underclass, ensuring a highly stratified social structure that benefited plantation owners.


Why would a landowner rather use slaves then indentured servents?

Landowners might prefer slaves over indentured servants because slaves are considered property and can be owned for life, providing a more stable and permanent labor force. Slaves also have fewer legal protections and rights than indentured servants, giving landowners more control over their work and minimizing the risk of servants completing their terms and leaving. Additionally, the transatlantic slave trade made slaves more readily available and often cheaper to acquire than indentured servants.


What these is a reason landowners would rather have slaves than indentured servants?

Landowners may prefer slaves over indentured servants because slaves are considered property with no time limit on their labor, while indentured servants have a set term of service and can negotiate for their rights. Slaves also provide a more stable and long-term workforce compared to indentured servants who may leave once their contract is fulfilled. Additionally, slaves can be seen as a permanent source of labor that can be inherited and passed down through generations.