Plantation owners preferred slaves over indentured servants because slaves provided a lifetime of unpaid labor, while indentured servants only served for a limited time. Slaves were also seen as property that could be inherited and sold, providing long-term economic benefits to plantation owners. Additionally, slaves were seen as a more controllable and permanent labor force compared to indentured servants, who had the possibility of earning their freedom.
Slaves were property and were not free to leave the plantation, but an indentured servant was a free white person who signed a 7 year contract. Indentured servitude often was not completed and since they were white they could fade into the population while any African American was a slave no matter where he/she was. They needed permission to leave the plantation.
It could be either honestest or most honest; I would prefer the latter for esthetic reasons.
Someone who does not like change may be referred to as being resistant to change or having a fixed mindset. They may prefer stability and predictability over new or different experiences.
Humanists preferred to study classical texts such as those by Greek and Roman philosophers, poets, and historians. They focused on human potential and achievements in fields such as art, literature, and philosophy, in contrast to a purely religious or theological education.
Thomas Hobbes preferred an absolute monarchy as the most effective form of government. He believed that a strong central authority was necessary to maintain order and prevent the chaos of the state of nature.
John Locke preferred a constitutional government where power is limited by a written constitution. He believed in a system where the ruler's authority is derived from the consent of the governed, promoting individual rights and the protection of private property.
they coulld use slaves longer
Plantation owners preferred slaves over indentured servants because slaves were considered lifelong property with no legal rights or protections, ensuring a cheap and permanent labor force. Slaves also provided a better return on investment over time compared to indentured servants, who were temporary and could eventually gain freedom and become competition in the labor market.
Plantation owners preferred slaves over indentured servants because slaves were considered property for life, providing a long-term and inexpensive source of labor. Indentured servants, on the other hand, only worked for a fixed period and were entitled to freedom and land after their contract ended, making them less profitable for plantation owners in the long run.
The children of female slaves didn't need to be bought.
Plantation owners preferred slaves over indentured servants because slaves were considered property and could be bought, sold, and inherited, providing a more permanent and stable labor force. Slaves were also seen as a lifetime investment whereas indentured servants were temporary workers whose contracts would expire. Additionally, slaves were often treated as less than human and did not have legal rights or protections, allowing plantation owners to exert complete control over them.
A landowner might prefer to use wage laborers instead of indentured servants because wage laborers provide more flexibility and control over the workforce. With wage laborers, the landowner can hire and fire workers as needed without being bound by the terms of a contract like with indentured servants. Additionally, wage laborers may have more experience and skills that can benefit the operations of the landowner.
Plantation owners preferred African slaves over indentured servants because slaves were seen as a more permanent and cost-effective labor source. Slaves were considered property for life, providing long-term labor stability, while indentured servants worked for a defined period before gaining freedom. Additionally, racial prejudices and laws made it easier to control and subjugate African slaves compared to European indentured servants.
Plantation owners preferred slaves over indentured servants because slaves were considered property and could be owned for life, providing a more permanent and reliable source of labor. Slaves were also seen as a more cost-effective solution as owners did not have to pay them wages or provide for their care after they were no longer able to work. Additionally, the system of slavery was deeply entrenched in the colonial economy and society, providing a consistent supply of labor that could be controlled and exploited without legal protections for the enslaved individuals.
Plantation owners preferred using slaves over indentured servants because slaves were perceived as a lifetime investment, as they were considered property that could be bought and sold. Slaves were also viewed as a more long-term and reliable labor force, as they had fewer legal rights and were enslaved for life, unlike indentured servants who would be freed after a set period of time. Slaves were also often seen as easier to control and exploit due to their lack of legal protections.
Owners of large plantations would prefer slaves over indentured servants because slaves could be owned for life and were considered property, providing greater control and ensuring a continuous source of cheap labor. Indentured servants had limited terms of service and some legal protections, making them less profitable and reliable for long-term agricultural work. Furthermore, slaves were seen as a permanent underclass, ensuring a highly stratified social structure that benefited plantation owners.
Landowners might prefer slaves over indentured servants because slaves are considered property and can be owned for life, providing a more stable and permanent labor force. Slaves also have fewer legal protections and rights than indentured servants, giving landowners more control over their work and minimizing the risk of servants completing their terms and leaving. Additionally, the transatlantic slave trade made slaves more readily available and often cheaper to acquire than indentured servants.
Landowners may prefer slaves over indentured servants because slaves are considered property with no time limit on their labor, while indentured servants have a set term of service and can negotiate for their rights. Slaves also provide a more stable and long-term workforce compared to indentured servants who may leave once their contract is fulfilled. Additionally, slaves can be seen as a permanent source of labor that can be inherited and passed down through generations.