they coulld use slaves longer
Chat with our AI personalities
Plantation owners preferred slaves over indentured servants because slaves were considered property for life, providing a long-term and inexpensive source of labor. Indentured servants, on the other hand, only worked for a fixed period and were entitled to freedom and land after their contract ended, making them less profitable for plantation owners in the long run.
Plantation owners preferred slaves over indentured servants because slaves were considered lifelong property with no legal rights or protections, ensuring a cheap and permanent labor force. Slaves also provided a better return on investment over time compared to indentured servants, who were temporary and could eventually gain freedom and become competition in the labor market.
Plantation owners preferred slaves over indentured servants because slaves were considered property and could be bought, sold, and inherited, providing a more permanent and stable labor force. Slaves were also seen as a lifetime investment whereas indentured servants were temporary workers whose contracts would expire. Additionally, slaves were often treated as less than human and did not have legal rights or protections, allowing plantation owners to exert complete control over them.
Plantation owners preferred slaves over indentured servants because slaves were considered property that could be bought and sold, ensuring a long-term and stable labor force. Unlike indentured servants, slaves did not have fixed contract terms and were bound for life, providing continuity and control over their workforce. Slaves also offered greater economic returns as their descendants could also be enslaved, perpetuating a system of free labor.
Slave owners referred to house servants as domestics or house slaves.