0
The northern states didn't have slavery as the southern states did, and they were smaller. They were afraid that if slaves were counted as part of the population that would give the southern states an advantage when they were represented in Congress. In 1790 35% of the population in VA was slave, so that can make a difference in the balance of power between states.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How did the northern states feel about counting the slaves?
The northern states were smaller states so they were out numbered by the south where the most,political power was located. The idea to count the slaves was a compromise so that other things could get done. Often people have to compromise to get something they want and this is what happened.
Why didn't northern states want or need slaves?
Because the Al-Qaeda won
What did northern states compromise when southern delegates finally consented to some commercial regulations?
One of the compromises that came about between the North and the South was the right for States to regulate slave trade for another 20 years, after which, the Government would take over. There was also a compromise that allowed southern states the right to count slaves as 3/5s of a person, whereas initially the North did not want slaves to be counted at all. This is how the representative numbers were chosen for the House, which led to the South agreeing to commercial regulations proposed by the North.
Where did northern states ban slavery?
because they didnt want slaves they didnt need them. Dont use this for your homework or research papaer like i did because all these answers are wrong. soo i hope you use this answer:)
What 2 states did the Confederacy want to join them?
The Northern slave-states of Kentucky and Missouri.
How did the northern states feel about counting the slaves?
The northern states were smaller states so they were out numbered by the south where the most,political power was located. The idea to count the slaves was a compromise so that other things could get done. Often people have to compromise to get something they want and this is what happened.
What did the southern states want in return for paying of the northern states dept?
to own slaves
Why did the southern states want to count slaves as part of their populations?
Southern states wanted to count slaves as part of their populations for the purpose of representation in the United States Congress. By counting slaves as part of the population, southern states could increase their representation in Congress, despite slaves not having the right to vote.
Why didn't northern states want or need slaves?
Because the Al-Qaeda won
What was the purpose of the three fifths compromise?
Although slaves couldn't vote, the Southern states wanted to count them for the purpose of increasing their representation in the House of Representatives. The Northern states didn't want to count slaves at all because the South insisted slaves were property and not persons. The Three Fifths Compromise was was just that...a compromise that allowed the South to count three-fifths of the slaves towards their total population which ultimately gave the South greater representation in congress than they would otherwise have had.
Did Rufus King want to count slaves as population?
No, Rufus King did not want to count slaves as part of the population for the purpose of representation in Congress. He was against including slaves in the population count because he believed it would give slave-holding states more political power even though slaves were not treated as equal citizens.
Which states wanted slaves to be counted as part of their population?
The articles of the confederation was the document used to determine how slaves would be counted in a states population. The articles of the confederation were part of the Three Fifths compromise.
What was the northern states and the southern states view on the 3 5 compromise?
The question was, how should slaves be counted for the purpose of Congressional representation? The South wanted to count all slaves as "population", because this would increase the number of Representatives from the slave states. The northern states didn't want to include slaves AT ALL; if they weren't fully citizens and couldn't vote, why should they be counted for purposes of representation? The "three fifths" compromise gave southern states some additional Congressional representation, without giving the South an overwhelming advantage.
Did the three fifths compromise settle the argument over how slaves were to be counted?
The 3/5ths Compromise settled the debate of how slaves were going to be counted in the House of Representatives. The southern states wanted to count each slave in the census so that those states would have a majority representation while the northern states did not want to count the slaves so that there would be equality in the House. Henry Clay proposed that 3/5 of the slave population would be counted in the census, thus settling the two sides. The three-fifths compromise was an agreement between Southern and Northern states reached during the Constitutional Convention of 1787, during which the basic framework of the United States was established. Under this compromise, slaves were counted as three-fifths of a human being for the purpose of taxation and representation in Congress. As a result, slave-owners and the Southern states got a great deal of political clout. As all compromises do, the three-fifths compromise started as a dispute. Most of the Northern states did not want to count slaves at all, arguing that they should be treated as property, since they didn't have votes or any other power. The Southern states, however, wanted to count slaves as people so that they would get more representation in Congress, solidifying their political power. The North resisted this, rightly fearing that counting slaves as people would increase the Congressional seats apportioned to the South, thereby making the South extremely formidable.
What happened to Northern slaves when the Emancipation Proclamation was issued?
That would mean slaves in the Border states - slave-states that had voted against joining the Confederacy. Those people would have to remain slaves until the war was won, as Lincoln did not want to upset powerful slave-owners in these crucially important states.
Why did northern states abolish slavery?
There wasn't slavery in the northern states because back in the late 1700's and early through mid 1800's the country was basically split in half. The southern states believed that having slaves isn't wrong, it was okay. But in the northern states people thought slavery is wrong so they didn't allow slaves. In the North, plenty of other people thought slavery was OK, but saw that it didn't fit the industrial system. Factory bosses didn't want slaves, they wanted free mobile labour.
What was the norths position of the counting of slaves for representation?
The Northern States did not want the slaves to have any representation because they feared the Southern States would gain more power because of the number of representatives. They wanted to have equall power with the rest of the country.
