Early versions of the M-16 had mechanical/ammunition problems that caused jamming and cost several Americans their lives. The AK-47 has very loose tolerances (parts did not fit together very precisely). This allowed a little bit of dirt/sand in the weapon to NOT interfere with shooting. The M-16 has very tight tolerances, and even a little bit of dirt in the workings can cause it to malfunction.
Both are very powerful, But the AK47 is more. The m16 has better accuracy tho.
no
An AK47 or Kalashnikov ( excuse my spelling ) followed by the m16
m4,m16,ak47
You get the ak47 or m16 or glock and shoot the eagle in the groin
ak47 m16 m15 m14 mp5 mr40 rocket launchers
In terms of most magazines on popular models such as the m16, m4, ak47, etc... yes.
A lot of that depends on if you have proper ammunition for the target. But for close range, open areas, or inside buildings, it is pretty decent. Its best quality is the accuracy. It is less powerful than the AK47, but much more accurate. For urban fighting, an AK47 with its heavy punch and penetrating power is better, but an M16 is very flexible and does decent in many situations, including longer ranges where an AK47 would be horribly inaccurate
they stole bazocas m16 famas ak47 and ur moms vagania
Even the very finest of tools are dangerous in the hands of the inept. I suggest you try them both & then form your own opinion.
first of all my favourite assault rifle is the m16. its better than the ak47 in some ways but the ak is better than the m16 in others wich makes them balanced for battle.the m16 can take attachments-grenade launcher EOTECH sight Combat scope for long ranges masterkey-shotgun barrel attachment(the ak doesnt have this one)foregrip for more steady shooting laser sight burst/single/auto...etc and the m16 is younger and a bit more modern than the AK but i don't care about theyre balance i think the m16 is better because it has that vietnamite/taliban pwnage smell-hpe i helped
The M16 rifle.