Because the court had sensationally ruled that slavery was legal in every state of the Union. They had decided to interpret the Constitution in the way that the Founding Fathers would have done. When they declared that a man's property was sacred, they would have included slaves within their definition of property. The Court had also declared that a black man could not be an American citizen, and had no business taking a white man to court. All of this was music to the ears of the Southern planters.
The Dred Scott decision
The Dred Scott decision stated that people of African decent imported to America were not citizens and not protected by the Constitution. The fourteenth and fifteenth amendments nullified that decision.
14th amendment
maria
They were delighted. It appeared to mean that every state in the Union was open for slavery.
Southern slave owners were happy with the Dred Scott Supreme Court decision because it allowed them to take their slaves into slave free territories and not give up ownership. The case undermined local sovereignty.
Because the court had sensationally ruled that slavery was legal in every state of the Union. They had decided to interpret the Constitution in the way that the Founding Fathers would have done. When they declared that a man's property was sacred, they would have included slaves within their definition of property. The Court had also declared that a black man could not be an American citizen, and had no business taking a white man to court. All of this was music to the ears of the Southern planters.
Southern states governments were pleased by the Supreme Court's Dred Scott decision because it reinforced the rights of slave owners and declared African Americans as non-citizens. This decision protected the institution of slavery and helped maintain the social and economic order in the South.
R.B.Y Scott has written: 'The psalms as christian praise'
They believed that since slaves were their property that they could have property wherever they pleased :]
Scott didn't win his freedom and the decision reinforced the idea that slaves were property. The Missouri Compromise was a blow to the southern states to gain more slave states. I don't think the Scott decision added anything to the compromise, but it did entrench slavery in the states where it existed.
The Dred Scott decision by the US Supreme Court in 1857 confirmed what large scale slave owners in the south always believed. That was that slavery was legal under the US Constitution. The Court's decision was controversial, however, only a constitutional amendment could change that decision.
Southerners were delighted with the Dred Scott decision, but northerners were outraged.
...slavery was protected by the constitution on the grounds that a man's property was sacred and slaves were property.
Southerners benefited the most from the Dred Scott Decision.
No, Democrats did not support the Dred Scott decision. The decision was made by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1857, and it was predominantly supported by Southern Democrats who wanted to protect the institution of slavery. The decision ruled that African Americans, whether enslaved or free, were not considered citizens and therefore did not have standing to sue in federal court.