0
What else can I help you with?
Why were southern states pleased with the supreme court ruling on dred Scott?
Southern slave holders were pleased about the US Supreme Court's decision in the Dred Scott case because the Court affirmed that slavery was legal. It also affirmed the right to return slaves to their farmlands even if their master died with a slave being a travel companion. This was the world in the USA in the 1800's before the Civil War.
Did democrats support dred Scott law?
No, Democrats did not support the Dred Scott decision. The decision was made by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1857, and it was predominantly supported by Southern Democrats who wanted to protect the institution of slavery. The decision ruled that African Americans, whether enslaved or free, were not considered citizens and therefore did not have standing to sue in federal court.
What was the effect of the supreme courts decision in loving v Virginia?
What was the effect of the Supreme Court's decision in Loving v. Virginia
What document states that have slaves are not citizens?
The Dred Scott v. Sandford Supreme Court decision in 1857 declared that enslaved individuals, or those descended from enslaved individuals, were not considered citizens and therefore did not have the right to sue in federal court. This decision further exacerbated tensions between Northern and Southern states in the lead-up to the Civil War.
How did the abolitionists react to the supreme courts decision in the Dred Scott case?
Abolitionists were outraged by the Supreme Court's decision in the Dred Scott case, as it ruled that African Americans, whether free or enslaved, were not citizens and therefore did not have the right to sue in federal court. They saw this decision as a setback to the abolitionist movement and a reinforcement of the institution of slavery.
Why were southern states pleased with the supreme court ruling on dred Scott?
Southern slave holders were pleased about the US Supreme Court's decision in the Dred Scott case because the Court affirmed that slavery was legal. It also affirmed the right to return slaves to their farmlands even if their master died with a slave being a travel companion. This was the world in the USA in the 1800's before the Civil War.
What caused Southern slave owners to be happy with the Dred Scott Supreme Court decision?
Southern slave owners were happy with the Dred Scott Supreme Court decision because it allowed them to take their slaves into slave free territories and not give up ownership. The case undermined local sovereignty.
Why were many southerners pleased by the court's decision in the Dred Scott case?
Because the Supreme Court ruled he was still a slave even though his owner died. The North was upset by that.
Is a Supreme Court decision permanent?
In most cases a Supreme Court decision is permanent. The current Supreme Court can change the decision of a previous Supreme Court.
What factors can overturn a Supreme Court decision?
A Supreme Court decision can be overturned by a constitutional amendment, a new Supreme Court decision, or a change in the composition of the Court.
Limited liability laws and the Supreme Court's decision prohibiting state governments from granting irrevocable charters to corportions greatly aided what?
Limited liability laws and the Supreme Court's decision prohibiting state governments from granting irrevocable charters to corporations greatly aided pre-established businesses with large amounts of capital. Limited liability laws reduced the financial risk of investors.
Why did southern slavery supporters approve of the Dred Scott US Supreme Court's decision?
The Dred Scott decision by the US Supreme Court in 1857 confirmed what large scale slave owners in the south always believed. That was that slavery was legal under the US Constitution. The Court's decision was controversial, however, only a constitutional amendment could change that decision.
What power of the Constitution justified the actions of the southern states prior to the Civil War?
The Supreme Court's decision that slavery enjoyed total protection by the Constitution.
How did the Supreme Court rule in the Miranda decision?
The supreme's court overturned Miranda conviction in a 5 to 4 decision.
To which amendment does this Supreme Court decision refer?
Since you didn't say WHICH Supreme Court decision, there is no way to answer the question.
Can a legislature overturn a supreme court decision holding a particular statute unconstitutional?
No it can't. The only way to overturn a supreme court decision is either another supreme court decision, or a constitutional amendment.
In confederation the supreme power is given to which governments?
state
