0
Scott argued he was a free man because he lived where slavery was illegal. He wasn't a free man for two reasons. One, Scott has no right to sue a federal government court because African Americans were not citizens. Two, Taney, said; merely living in free territory did not make an enslaved person free.
Dred Scott claimed he was no longer enslaved because he had been taken to live in free territories where slavery was prohibited. He argued that his time in those territories should have made him a free man under the principle of "once free, always free."
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Which enslaved man sued for his freedom?
Dred Scott is a renowned example of an enslaved man who sued for his freedom. In 1857, the US Supreme Court ruled in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case, denying Scott's bid for freedom on the grounds that enslaved individuals were not considered US citizens.
Why was the dred Scott case brought to Supreme Court?
The Dred Scott case was brought to the Supreme Court to resolve the legal status of Dred Scott, an enslaved man who claimed his freedom because he had lived in free territories with his owner. The case raised questions about slavery in the United States and whether enslaved individuals could be considered citizens with legal rights.
What did Dred Scott based his claim for freedom on?
Dred Scott based his claim for freedom on the fact that his master had taken him to free states and territories.
What did dred Scott base his claim on freedom on?
Dred Scot's master had taken him to a free territory.
Who was the slave that sued for his freedom in the supreme court?
Dred Scott was the slave who sued for his freedom in the Supreme Court in the landmark Dred Scott v. Sandford case in 1857. The Supreme Court decision ruled against granting him his freedom and also declared that African Americans, whether free or enslaved, were not U.S. citizens.
Who was an enslaved person who sued for freedom?
Dred Scott
Which enslaved man sued for his freedom?
Dred Scott is a renowned example of an enslaved man who sued for his freedom. In 1857, the US Supreme Court ruled in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case, denying Scott's bid for freedom on the grounds that enslaved individuals were not considered US citizens.
Enslaved man denied his freedom by the US Supreme Court?
Dred Scott
What enslaved man sued for his freedom in a landmark supreme court case?
Dred Scott.
What did Dred Scott base his claim of freedom on?
Dred Scot's master had taken him to a free territory.
What political stand did Dred Scott take answer?
Dred Scott was an enslaved African American man who went to court to sue for his freedom. The court case, known as Dred Scott v. Sandford, ultimately ruled against him and declared that African Americans, whether enslaved or free, were not considered American citizens and therefore could not sue in federal court.
What reasons did Taney give for why he believed Dred Scott was an enslaved person?
he was fighting for black freedom
Why was the dred Scott case brought to Supreme Court?
The Dred Scott case was brought to the Supreme Court to resolve the legal status of Dred Scott, an enslaved man who claimed his freedom because he had lived in free territories with his owner. The case raised questions about slavery in the United States and whether enslaved individuals could be considered citizens with legal rights.
What did Dred Scott based his claim for freedom on?
Dred Scott based his claim for freedom on the fact that his master had taken him to free states and territories.
What did Scott base on his claim for freedom on?
Dred Scott based his claim for freedom on the fact that his master had taken him to free states and territories.
What language did dred Scott speak?
Dred Scott likely spoke English, as he was enslaved in the United States where English was the predominant language. Additionally, during that time period, many enslaved individuals were not taught to read or write and likely only spoke the language of their captors.
Who was the enslaved African American who tried the sue the court but was denyed in 1857 by the supreme court?
Dred Scott
