0
Dred Scott based his claim for freedom on the fact that his master had taken him to free states and territories.
Dred Scott based his claim for freedom on the fact that his master had taken him to free states and territories.
Dred Scott based his claim for freedom on the fact that he had lived in free states and territories, which he argued made him a free man. He believed that his time in these areas should have legally emancipated him from slavery.
His master had taken him to a free territory.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What did dred Scott base his claim on freedom on?
Dred Scot's master had taken him to a free territory.
Ask us did Dred Scott base his claim for freedom on?
Dred Scott based his claim for freedom on the fact that he had lived in free territories and states where slavery was illegal, which he believed should entitle him to freedom. He argued that his time in these locations had made him a free man under the law.
What did dread Scott base his calm for freedom on?
Dred Scott based his claim for freedom on the fact that he had lived in free territories and states where slavery was prohibited. He argued that these experiences should entitle him to freedom under the law.
Was the Chief Justice who presided at the trial of Dred Scott the slave who sued the government for his freedom.?
No, the Chief Justice who presided over the Dred Scott case was Roger B. Taney. Dred Scott was the slave who sued for his freedom based on his residence in free territories.
How much Did Dr John Emerson pay for Dred Scott?
Dr. John Emerson did not pay for Dred Scott; rather, he was owned by other individuals before eventually being owned by the Emerson family. Dred Scott's legal case revolved around his claim to freedom based on having lived in free territories, despite being a slave.
What did Scott base on his claim for freedom on?
Dred Scott based his claim for freedom on the fact that his master had taken him to free states and territories.
What did dred Scott base his claim on freedom on?
Dred Scot's master had taken him to a free territory.
Ask us did Dred Scott base his claim for freedom on?
Dred Scott based his claim for freedom on the fact that he had lived in free territories and states where slavery was illegal, which he believed should entitle him to freedom. He argued that his time in these locations had made him a free man under the law.
What did Dred Scott base his claim of freedom on?
Dred Scot's master had taken him to a free territory.
What did dread Scott base his calm for freedom on?
Dred Scott based his claim for freedom on the fact that he had lived in free territories and states where slavery was prohibited. He argued that these experiences should entitle him to freedom under the law.
What did Dred Scott base his claim for freedom?
That he had once lived on free soil, where his freedom would have been granted automatically, if he had applied for it then.
Was the Chief Justice who presided at the trial of Dred Scott the slave who sued the government for his freedom.?
No, the Chief Justice who presided over the Dred Scott case was Roger B. Taney. Dred Scott was the slave who sued for his freedom based on his residence in free territories.
Who was the slave that sued for his freedom in the case Dred Scott vs Sandford?
Dred Scott
How much Did Dr John Emerson pay for Dred Scott?
Dr. John Emerson did not pay for Dred Scott; rather, he was owned by other individuals before eventually being owned by the Emerson family. Dred Scott's legal case revolved around his claim to freedom based on having lived in free territories, despite being a slave.
What was dred Scott looking for?
freedom
Who was dred Scott and what he do?
Dred Scott was a slave and he tried to get his freedom by going to court and talk it out but he failed
What Dred Scott claimed freedom in the courts based on?
Dred Scott claimed freedom on the basis of saying that he was illegally a slave when his owner moved him over to the northern-free states. However, in order to sue somebody, it is required that you be a U.S. citizen. Dred Scott was viewed as property, and the case was never acknowledged.
