Dred Scott based his claim for freedom on the fact that his master had taken him to free states and territories.
Chat with our AI personalities
Dred Scott based his claim for freedom on the fact that his master had taken him to free states and territories.
Dred Scott based his claim for freedom on the fact that he had lived in free states and territories, which he argued made him a free man. He believed that his time in these areas should have legally emancipated him from slavery.
Dred Scot's master had taken him to a free territory.
Dred Scott based his claim for freedom on the fact that he had lived in free territories and states where slavery was illegal, which he believed should entitle him to freedom. He argued that his time in these locations had made him a free man under the law.
Dred Scott based his claim for freedom on the fact that he had lived in free territories and states where slavery was prohibited. He argued that these experiences should entitle him to freedom under the law.
No, the Chief Justice who presided over the Dred Scott case was Roger B. Taney. Dred Scott was the slave who sued for his freedom based on his residence in free territories.
Dr. John Emerson did not pay for Dred Scott; rather, he was owned by other individuals before eventually being owned by the Emerson family. Dred Scott's legal case revolved around his claim to freedom based on having lived in free territories, despite being a slave.