african kings were given many things in thier manipulation of humans during times of slavery, although africans seem to be a victim of slavery they were not actually slaves at all, in the colonies of america africans were an insurgent sent by african kings disguised as slaves to get close to the homes of colonists and there wives and daughters, this went on many years before the colonies in many nations and peoples, but the most prevalent victim in this action is the peolpe referred to as white, as these women were traded by low moraled deceitful people for many things over time, living under an almost constant threat of murder rape and incarsseration(captivity) under the cloak of governments these vile human beings have continued this trade even to this day at the request of thier constituants regardless of the age of the female victim who almost always behaves in a way that you would think its what she wants only to keep form being beaten or killed.
Because eurpeans asked them to do so Since European countries were too weak to enslave africans themselves, they paid African kings to go with their powerful armies and enslave other africans. It got to the point that all slave trade depended on African kings. If it wasn`t for these African kings and their powerful armies, europeans would have never ever been able to exploit Africa. Since these African kings would not allow them to enslave africans without paying a fair price.See http://www.theroot.com/id/48421?GT1=38002. An ariticle about Wole Soyinka who gives us such a great insight about how blacks are the only responsible for slave trade.Another great fairytale brought to you by Cambridge University`s We-don't-have-an-explanation-or-solution Department of History.AnswerThe African nations (Edomites) were the enemies of the Africans they sold into slavery: Ezekiel 35:1-5. The captured Africans were God's chosen people, the Israelites and God had given them the land of Canaan. By sending the Israelies into captivity the Edomites gained control of the land of Canaan: Ezekiel 33:23-24. Slavery was made possible by the very people who were captured. The Israelites had been given the commands and laws of God to live by but they rebelled against them and were subsequently punished: Deuteronomy 28:15-68.
First class are kings priest Palaces official second class are the free clients ( Dependent To !st class) Third class Commoner (Free Clients) Fourth Class are the Slaves (prisoners of War, Debtors Or Just Slaves)
The Persian title for king was the word "Shah." There was also the title "Shahanshah" which means King of Kings and also "Padishah" which means Great king.
Pharoahs were given absolute control. Like kings or czars in other countries, pharoahs could do pretty much whatever they wanted.
The god was at the top then the pharaoh was under the god then the kings under them were the law enforcement under them were the scribes and under them were the citizens and finally the slaves.
African kings sold their African slaves to the white people
they were sold by the kings and queens of Africa and then brought all over the world as slaves
i think it is money and food
the kings in African kingdoms were lured by Europeans with gifts such as manufactured goods and money and in return they allowed other Africans to be exported as slaves
Lords ruled pieces of land given to them by kings in exchange for promises of support.
Yes the kings of the African tribes on the West Coat of Africa became very rich by selling slaves they had captured to the slave traders.
African
sometimes African tribal kings would use capture and use men from other tribes to sell to the slave trade in exchange for weapons. They cant be blamed for the slave trade but they did help it along so in a way they kind of are to blame
No, by the time of Tutankhamun, figures of slaves instead of real slaves were buried with kings.
kings
Kings and slaves.?
1 kings