I do not understand your question.
Do you mean the speed of its shockwave? That is supersonic.
Do you mean the speed of its x-rays and gamma rays? That is the speed of light.
Do you mean the speed of its fallout? That depends on wind speeds.
Do you mean the speed of its delivery vehicle? Is that a bomber? Subsonic. Is that an ICBM? Roughly orbital velocity. Is that a cruise missile? Subsonic. Is that an artillery shell? Supersonic. Is that an antisubmarine depth bomb? Slow.
Or do you mean some other speed?
A more precisely worded question will help get a more precise answer.
No. LLNL even tested several Uranium-Hydride bombs in the 1950s. Even though their computer models said the devices should explode, none gave a nuclear yield. One could use the waste from the reactor as a Radiological Weapon, but the reactor itself is not useful as a weapon.
It depends on the delivery mechanism. If dropped by a modern jet bomber, a nuke can acheive low supersonic speeds. If on a intercontinental ballistic missile, a nuclear weapon can reach speeds exceeding 15 times the speed of sound, or several thousand miles per hour.
The biggest nuclear weapon ever tested was the Tsar Bomba, a hydrogen bomb detonated by the Soviet Union in 1961. It had a yield of 50 megatons, making it the most powerful nuclear weapon ever detonated.
A nuclear weapon is one of the most powerful weapons in existence, so it is difficult to say if there is a specific weapon that is definitively stronger. However, some may argue that certain future technologies, such as antimatter weapons or advanced cyber warfare capabilities, could potentially surpass the destructive power of a nuclear weapon.
The amount of radiation produced by a nuclear weapon can vary depending on its size and yield. However, a single detonation of a nuclear weapon can produce tens of thousands to millions of rads within the immediate vicinity of ground zero. This level of radiation exposure can be lethal to humans and cause widespread health effects.
The meaning of the word nuclear weapon, is a weapon that has a nuclear warhead on it.
This nuclear weapon is called an atomic bomb or a nuclear bomb
Nuclear weapon detonations
If by "bomb" you mean a conventional explosive weapon, then the nuclear weapon is more powerful.
nuclear chemicals such as plutonium
NO
no
No. LLNL even tested several Uranium-Hydride bombs in the 1950s. Even though their computer models said the devices should explode, none gave a nuclear yield. One could use the waste from the reactor as a Radiological Weapon, but the reactor itself is not useful as a weapon.
the first nuclear weapon was issued in WW2 created by the americans in a chicargo squash court
plutonium + weapon
yes
you can't