v Behaviourist theory (Skinner), are born with a blank slate and therefore need to learn everything we know through experience, he uses the principles of positive and negative reinforcement.
v Chomsky proposed that the LAD is an innate device which we are born with, when we are born it is in the off position and through the experience of language it is switched on and children are able to learn language
Chomsky argued that language is an innate cognitive ability with a universal grammar that guides language development, while Skinner believed that language is learned through conditioning and reinforcement. Chomsky's theory emphasizes the role of Biology and genetics in language acquisition, whereas Skinner's theory focuses on the importance of external stimuli and environmental factors.
Chomsky and Bloomfield were both influential linguists, but they held different views on language. Bloomfield was a behaviorist who believed that language could be studied through observable behavior, while Chomsky argued for the importance of innate linguistic structures in language acquisition and use. Chomsky's theories, such as Universal Grammar, have had a more lasting impact on the field of linguistics.
Saussure focused on the structure and system of language, emphasizing the relationship between signifier and signified in creating meaning. Chomsky, on the other hand, emphasized universal grammar and the innate cognitive structures that enable humans to acquire language. While Saussure's focus was more on the synchronic aspects of language, Chomsky's work delved into both synchronic and diachronic aspects, such as language acquisition and evolution.
One limitation of Chomsky's linguistic theory is its focus on idealized grammatical structures rather than real language use. Another limitation is its emphasis on innate knowledge of grammar, which may overlook the role of social and cultural factors in shaping language. Additionally, some critics argue that Chomsky's theory does not adequately account for the diversity and variability found in actual languages.
Universal grammar refers to the innate set of linguistic principles that all human languages share, proposed by Noam Chomsky. Language universals, on the other hand, are patterns or features found across a wide range of languages that are not dependent on universal grammar. In essence, universal grammar is about the underlying structure of grammar in all languages, while language universals refer to common characteristics found in languages around the world.
The study of language refers to the scientific examination of language as a system, including its structure, rules, and use in communication. The study of a language refers to learning and understanding the specifics of a particular language, such as grammar, vocabulary, and pronunciation.
Chomsky and Bloomfield were both influential linguists, but they held different views on language. Bloomfield was a behaviorist who believed that language could be studied through observable behavior, while Chomsky argued for the importance of innate linguistic structures in language acquisition and use. Chomsky's theories, such as Universal Grammar, have had a more lasting impact on the field of linguistics.
Saussure focused on the structure and system of language, emphasizing the relationship between signifier and signified in creating meaning. Chomsky, on the other hand, emphasized universal grammar and the innate cognitive structures that enable humans to acquire language. While Saussure's focus was more on the synchronic aspects of language, Chomsky's work delved into both synchronic and diachronic aspects, such as language acquisition and evolution.
Both Montessori and Chomsky emphasize the importance of a child's natural ability to learn and develop language skills. Montessori education encourages hands-on learning and self-directed exploration, while Chomsky's theory posits that children are born with an innate capacity for language acquisition. Both approaches emphasize the role of the environment in supporting language development and the importance of stimulating a child's curiosity and independence.
what is the difference between speech,language and communication??There is a huge difference between language and communication
Chomsky was a linguist who focused on the innate biological structures that underlie language production and acquisition, proposing that humans are born with a universal grammar. Saussure, on the other hand, was a structuralist who emphasized the structural relationships between elements in language, highlighting the importance of synchronic analysis. Chomsky's work led to the development of generative grammar, while Saussure's ideas laid the foundation for structuralism and semiotics in linguistics.
there is between language
wht is the basic difference between English language with urdu language
One limitation of Chomsky's linguistic theory is its focus on idealized grammatical structures rather than real language use. Another limitation is its emphasis on innate knowledge of grammar, which may overlook the role of social and cultural factors in shaping language. Additionally, some critics argue that Chomsky's theory does not adequately account for the diversity and variability found in actual languages.
yes. the dsi is slightly skinner and has a camera,and it has wi fi, meaning it an go connect on internet.
A langue ( "tongue") is a language, in which a parole ( from parabola) is a spoken word.---------langue nthe French word for "language". The term was used by the linguistSaussure to mean the system of a language, that is the arrangement ofsounds and words which speakers of a language have a shared knowledgeof or, as Saussure said, "agree to use". Langue is the "ideal" form of alanguage. Saussure called the actual use of language by people in speechor writing "parole".Saussure's distinction between "langue" and "parole" is similar toChomsky's distinction between COMPETENCE and PERFORMANCE. Butwhereas for Saussure the repository of "langue" is the SPEECH COMMUNITY,for Chomsky the repository of "competence" is the "idealspeaker/hearer". So Saussure's distinction is basically sociolinguistic (seeSOCIOLINGUISTICS) whereas Chomsky's is basically psycholinguisticRichrds, J.C & Schmidt (2002). Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. Longman
Language.
Language.