The democratization or democratic participant theoryemphasizes and supports the following mentioned thing's importance:
Democratization / Democratic Participant Media Theory's staple principles are summarized by Mc Quail, in the year 1987. The principles are mentioned below:
Democratic-participant theory is in the support of following points:
There was a challenge given by the theory to the requirements for & desirability of centralized, uniform, professionalized, commercialized, state-controlled or high-cost media. Instead of these above mentioned media, encouragement should be given to small-scale, multiple, local, committed or non-institutional media, as these media link the senders with the receivers & also give favor to interaction's horizontal designs or patterns.
Theory's practical aspects are varied and many, including alternative or underground press, micro-media's availability in the rural areas, community-cable TV, wall-posters and media designed for ethnic-minorities and women. Interaction and participation are the important concepts of the democratic participant media theory. This theory has been considered as reaction. It is expresses by this theory that the faith in a people has been broken by the disillusionment's sense with the established parties of politics & with the system of media. Media should not be taken in use for empowering and stimulating pluralistic-groups. Democratic participant theory, unlike the social-responsibility theory, focuses on the new small-media's development which the members of the group can control directly.
Democratic Participant Theory emphasizes the active involvement of citizens in decision-making processes, promoting transparency and accountability. Authoritarian Theory, on the other hand, concentrates power and decision-making in the hands of a centralized authority, limiting citizen participation and freedoms.
Authoritarian theory advocates for strong central authority and limited individual freedoms, prioritizing order and control. Libertarian theory emphasizes individual liberty and minimal government intervention, promoting personal autonomy and freedom of choice.
Within-group differences refer to variations that exist among individuals or data points within the same group or category. This can include differences in characteristics, behaviors, or outcomes within the group. Between-group differences refer to variations that exist between different groups or categories. This can include differences in averages, distributions, or patterns observed when comparing multiple groups.
Goldberg's thesis is that biological differences between men and women underpin societal gender roles and differences in behavior. He argues that these differences are rooted in evolutionary biology and are responsible for various disparities between the sexes.
Some similarities between Australia and Japan include their advanced economies, high standards of living, and strong emphasis on education. However, they differ in terms of geography, culture, and language, as Japan is an island nation in East Asia with a homogenous population, while Australia is a continent-country in Oceania with a diverse multicultural society. Additionally, Japan has a long history of ancient traditions, whereas Australia has a more recent history of colonization.
A relationship between two things being compared is a connection that helps to highlight similarities or differences between them. It can involve comparing characteristics, behaviors, functions, or any other relevant aspects to draw conclusions or insights about the similarities or differences between the two things. Comparing two things can help to clarify their relationship and enhance understanding of both.
An authoritarian government is characterized by centralized power and limited individual freedoms, with decisions made by a single ruler or small group. In contrast, a democratic government is based on principles of equality, participation, and accountability, where power is distributed among elected representatives and citizens have the right to participate in decision-making processes through free and fair elections.
participant is qualitative structured is quantitative
There isn't automatically any. A democratic government can be authoritarian, or liberal. Democratic denotes the form of its constitution, authoritarian its manner of government. The two concepts are not mutually exclusive, though their spirit is broadly contrary.
there is a variety of them, check ur socail sudies book. :)
there is'nt one. really there both at the end gonna do the same thing. jack sht. your welcome
Federalist==founded in1792====dissolved in 1820==Democratic- Republican==founded in 1792====dissolved in 1868==
india has a democratic government and saudi arabia has monarchy.
Canada has a democratic government, whereas China has a communist government.
Answer 1Authoritarianism is absolute rule by one, usually a Dictator or Monarch and Democracy is rule by all or by every citizen having a say in what is done.Answer 2The difference between an authoritarian and democratic government is the power held by its leaders. In an authoritarian government, power entails suppression of the opposition and human rights. In a democratic government, on the other hand, power is spread between different institutions that act as a check and balance on each other.
There are several major differences between the Republican and Democratic platforms. The Democratic platform tends to focus on social reform and programs to help the people, while the Republican platform tends to favor less government involvement in the lives of citizens.
A Democratic Republican was in favor of individual freedom foremost, and was less worried about government.
military goverment is gotten through the use of force while democratic goverment is gotten through the vote of the people