answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

A trial by ordeal was a primitive method of determining a person's guilt or innocence by subjecting the accused person to dangerous or painful tests believed to be under divine control; escape was usually taken as a sign of innocence. in England a woman accused of being a witch was tide to a chair which hung over a pond. She was lowered into the pond for a period of time. If she survived the ordeal she was let go. If she drowned it proved her to be a witch and was buried outside of church grounds.

Trial by combat was between an opposing enemy. Boxing could be classed as a combat. Anything where fighting took place between opposite forces or individuals.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What is the difference between trial by ordeal and trial by combat?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What is the difference between trial by jury and trial by ordeal?

baho kag lobot


What are some disadvantages of trial by ordeal?

what is the disadcantages of trial by ordeal


The three methods of determining innocence or guilt in Germanic law were?

oath-swearing trial by ordeal or combat compensation


What were two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the middle ages?

Two methods were: - trial by ordeal, in which the accused had to pass a dangerous test, like thrown into a well, and - trial by combat, in which he had to fight to prove his innocence. The two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the early middle ages were trial by combat or ordeal.


What were methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the Early Middle Ages.?

Two methods were: - trial by ordeal, in which the accused had to pass a dangerous test, like thrown into a well, and - trial by combat, in which he had to fight to prove his innocence. The two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the early middle ages were trial by combat or ordeal.


What were two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the Early Middle Ages?

Two methods were: - trial by ordeal, in which the accused had to pass a dangerous test, like thrown into a well, and - trial by combat, in which he had to fight to prove his innocence. The two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the early middle ages were trial by combat or ordeal.


What were two methods for deciding the guilt or the innocence of accused criminals in the early middle ages?

Two methods were: - trial by ordeal, in which the accused had to pass a dangerous test, like thrown into a well, and - trial by combat, in which he had to fight to prove his innocence. The two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the early middle ages were trial by combat or ordeal.


What were the two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the early Middle Ages?

Two methods were: - trial by ordeal, in which the accused had to pass a dangerous test, like thrown into a well, and - trial by combat, in which he had to fight to prove his innocence. The two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the early middle ages were trial by combat or ordeal.


What were two methods of deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the Early Middle Ages?

Two methods were: - trial by ordeal, in which the accused had to pass a dangerous test, like thrown into a well, and - trial by combat, in which he had to fight to prove his innocence. The two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the early middle ages were trial by combat or ordeal.


What were two method for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the early middle ages?

Two methods were: - trial by ordeal, in which the accused had to pass a dangerous test, like thrown into a well, and - trial by combat, in which he had to fight to prove his innocence. The two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the early middle ages were trial by combat or ordeal.


What were two methods for deciding the guilt of innocence of accused criminals in the Early method ages?

Two methods were: - trial by ordeal, in which the accused had to pass a dangerous test, like thrown into a well, and - trial by combat, in which he had to fight to prove his innocence. The two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the early middle ages were trial by combat or ordeal.


What replaced trial by ordeal and combat?

idono im only 35 years old stop asking mhe these qetions and suck mhe