The act of observational research is very different to that of casually watching people undertake an activity. Take these two scenarios for example.
*You are studying to become a "Bio-chemist" and your lecturer is teaching you how to mix chemicals in which you need to write an assignment on the chemical reactions* This is observational research.
Casually watching is like settling down at night to watch your favourite television show.
Observational research is a systematic, structured study that involves documenting and analyzing behavior in a controlled setting for a specific research purpose. Casual people watching, on the other hand, is an informal and unstructured activity where individuals casually observe others in everyday environments without any specific research goal in mind.
establish causality between variables by manipulating one variable and measuring its effect on another variable. Observational research can observe and describe associations between variables but cannot determine cause-and-effect relationships.
Vicarious learning involves learning through direct experiences, whereas observational learning involves learning by watching others and imitating their behavior. Vicarious learning often involves gaining knowledge or skills from someone else's actions, while observational learning focuses on observing and replicating behaviors in a social context. Both processes rely on external sources of information rather than personal trial and error.
The primary difference is that in an experiment, the researcher actively manipulates or controls one or more variables to observe the effect on another variable, while in an observational study, the researcher simply observes and records data without intervening or controlling any variables. Experiments allow for more control over variables and can establish cause-and-effect relationships, while observational studies can only establish correlations.
A cross-sectional study is a type of observational research that analyzes data collected from a population at a single point in time to assess relationships between variables. In contrast, a retrospective study looks at past data to investigate possible links between exposure and outcome variables.
Observational studies can provide valuable insights, but they have limitations. They can suggest associations between factors, but cannot prove causation. Factors like confounding variables and biases can impact the reliability of observational studies. It is important to interpret their results cautiously and consider other types of studies for more robust evidence.
establish causality between variables by manipulating one variable and measuring its effect on another variable. Observational research can observe and describe associations between variables but cannot determine cause-and-effect relationships.
in an experiment, the researcher manipulates a variable
In an experiment, the researcher manipulates a variable.
yes
the difference between a research question and objective is the question is about the research the objective is what you want to prove with the research
difference between survey and experiment
what is traditional research
Observational classification is based on what you see and observe about the thing (maybe during an experiment) While theoretical classification is based on what you are being taught or what you have been taught or what you read about the thing.
sm is tc
Personality is who we are and what we do when everyone is watching. On the other hand, Character is again who we are and what we do, but, when no is watching.
I think a research question is in a question form, starts with How, What, ... while a research objective starts with To identify......, To explore.......
The difference between research and evaluation is that research is were you find out about something and evaluation is were you say what you think of your work how you can improve it you usually evaluate your work once you Finnish something.