0
The act of observational research is very different to that of casually watching people undertake an activity. Take these two scenarios for example.
*You are studying to become a "Bio-chemist" and your lecturer is teaching you how to mix chemicals in which you need to write an assignment on the chemical reactions* This is observational research.
Casually watching is like settling down at night to watch your favourite television show.
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Taiga
Jordan
LaoObservational research is a systematic, structured study that involves documenting and analyzing behavior in a controlled setting for a specific research purpose. Casual people watching, on the other hand, is an informal and unstructured activity where individuals casually observe others in everyday environments without any specific research goal in mind.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
One way in which experimental research differs from observational research is that only experimental research can?
establish causality between variables by manipulating one variable and measuring its effect on another variable. Observational research can observe and describe associations between variables but cannot determine cause-and-effect relationships.
Difference in vicarious and observational learning?
Vicarious learning involves learning through direct experiences, whereas observational learning involves learning by watching others and imitating their behavior. Vicarious learning often involves gaining knowledge or skills from someone else's actions, while observational learning focuses on observing and replicating behaviors in a social context. Both processes rely on external sources of information rather than personal trial and error.
What is the primary difference between an experiment and an observastional study?
The primary difference is that in an experiment, the researcher actively manipulates or controls one or more variables to observe the effect on another variable, while in an observational study, the researcher simply observes and records data without intervening or controlling any variables. Experiments allow for more control over variables and can establish cause-and-effect relationships, while observational studies can only establish correlations.
Are observational studys reliable?
Observational studies can provide valuable insights, but they have limitations. They can suggest associations between factors, but cannot prove causation. Factors like confounding variables and biases can impact the reliability of observational studies. It is important to interpret their results cautiously and consider other types of studies for more robust evidence.
What is CROSS sectional study retrospective study?
A cross-sectional study is a type of observational research that analyzes data collected from a population at a single point in time to assess relationships between variables. In contrast, a retrospective study looks at past data to investigate possible links between exposure and outcome variables.
