answersLogoWhite

0

A valid deductive argument will have a valid premise and conclusion and a fallacy may be true, it all matters on how you came to the conclusion.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Math & Arithmetic

Which fallacy occurs when there is an error in inductive or deductive reasoning?

mazda


What is the difference between a non sequitur and a post hoc ergo propter hoc argument?

A non sequitur is a logical fallacy where a conclusion does not logically follow from the premises or arguments presented, resulting in a disconnection in reasoning. In contrast, a post hoc ergo propter hoc argument assumes a causal relationship between two events simply because one follows the other in time, often ignoring other possible explanations. While both involve faulty reasoning, the non sequitur lacks a logical connection entirely, whereas the post hoc fallacy specifically misattributes causation based on sequence.


What is error in personae?

Error in personae refers to a logical fallacy where an argument is directed against the person rather than the argument they are making. This fallacy occurs when someone attacks the character, motive, or other attributes of an individual instead of addressing the substance of their argument. It undermines rational discourse, as it shifts the focus from the issue at hand to personal attributes, often leading to a dismissal of valid points based on irrelevant personal criticisms.


What is fallacy n types?

A fallacy is a flaw in reasoning that undermines the logic of an argument. There are two main types of fallacies: formal and informal. Formal fallacies are errors in the structure of the argument, while informal fallacies arise from issues with the content or context, such as emotional appeals or misleading language. Recognizing these fallacies is crucial for critical thinking and effective debate.


What is the equivalence fallacy?

An Equivalence fallacy is the error of defining distinct and conflicting items in similar terms, thus equating tow items that are not, in fact, equal. An author who suggests that one act of serious wrongdoing does not differ from a minor offence commits the fallacy of moral equivalence. A different kind of Equivalence Fallacy is used when, for example, a politician argues: "Yes, I used illegal money to fund my campaign ... but so did my opponent!" This type of moral equivalence fallacy is called the "tu quo" argument ("But you're one too!").

Related Questions

What is the difference between a formal fallacy and an informal fallacy?

A formal fallacy is a mistake in the logical structure of an argument, while an informal fallacy is an error in the content or context of the argument.


What is the difference between a formal and informal fallacy in logic?

A formal fallacy in logic occurs when the structure of an argument is flawed, leading to an invalid conclusion. An informal fallacy, on the other hand, involves errors in reasoning or the content of the argument, making it unsound.


What is the difference between an informal and formal fallacy in logical reasoning?

An informal fallacy in logical reasoning is a mistake in reasoning that occurs due to the content or context of the argument, such as using irrelevant information. A formal fallacy, on the other hand, is a mistake in the logical structure of an argument, such as a flaw in the way the premises lead to the conclusion.


What is the difference between a fallacy and a stereotype?

A fallacy is a false or mistaken belief or argument, while a stereotype is an oversimplified belief about a group of people based on characteristics like race, gender, or nationality. Fallacies are errors in reasoning, whereas stereotypes are generalizations that may not hold true for every individual in a group.


Which fallacy occurs when there is an error in inductive or deductive reasoning?

mazda


What are the benefits of studing logic?

Logic is an important subject because it teaches relation. This has far reaching effects beyond mathematics, where it is often studied. It teaches deductive reasoning, such as the difference between reason and fallacy.


A fallacy is basically a what?

A fallacy is basically an argument with poor reasoning. An argument can be considered to be fallacious even if the conclusion is true or not.


What if an argument does not commit a fallacy?

If an argument does not commit a fallacy, it means that the reasoning provided supports the conclusion without any logical errors. This indicates that the argument is valid and that the premises lead to a justifiable conclusion. It also suggests that the argument is logically sound and can be considered a strong or persuasive piece of reasoning.


Can you identify the fallacy in the argument presented?

The fallacy in the argument presented is called ad hominem, which involves attacking the person making the argument rather than addressing the argument itself.


What is the difference between formal and informal speech?

A fallacy is a mistaken belief. A formal fallacy is one in which the argument itself is wrong, which makes it always wrong. An informal fallacy is one in which the reasoning is wrong, not the form of the argument itself.


What is a misleading argument called?

Fallacy


What will make an argument weaker?

fallacy