mazda
An Equivalence fallacy is the error of defining distinct and conflicting items in similar terms, thus equating tow items that are not, in fact, equal. An author who suggests that one act of serious wrongdoing does not differ from a minor offence commits the fallacy of moral equivalence. A different kind of Equivalence Fallacy is used when, for example, a politician argues: "Yes, I used illegal money to fund my campaign ... but so did my opponent!" This type of moral equivalence fallacy is called the "tu quo" argument ("But you're one too!").
Affirmative Syllogism: All P are Q X is a P X is a Q Negative Syllogism: All P are Q X is not a Q X is not P Both syllogisms are always valid. but dont be fooled by their evil twins the fallacy of affirmation and the fallacy of negation.
The origin of the word fallacy dates back to 1350-1400. The word fallacy means deceptive or misleading. As a simple example, when one says the world is flat it is a complete fallacy.
The informal fallacy of accident (also called destroying the exception or a dicto simpliciter ad dictum secundum quid) is a deductively valid but unsound argument occurring in statistical syllogisms (an argument based on a generalization) when an exception to a rule of thumb is ignored. It is one of the thirteen fallacies originally identified by Aristotle. The fallacy occurs when one attempts to apply a general rule to an irrelevant situation. For example: Cutting people with knives is a crime. → Surgeons cut people with knives. → Surgeons are criminals.
A fallacy is a false or mistaken belief or argument, while a stereotype is an oversimplified belief about a group of people based on characteristics like race, gender, or nationality. Fallacies are errors in reasoning, whereas stereotypes are generalizations that may not hold true for every individual in a group.
mazda
Logic is an important subject because it teaches relation. This has far reaching effects beyond mathematics, where it is often studied. It teaches deductive reasoning, such as the difference between reason and fallacy.
A fallacy is basically an argument with poor reasoning. An argument can be considered to be fallacious even if the conclusion is true or not.
If an argument does not commit a fallacy, it means that the reasoning provided supports the conclusion without any logical errors. This indicates that the argument is valid and that the premises lead to a justifiable conclusion. It also suggests that the argument is logically sound and can be considered a strong or persuasive piece of reasoning.
A fallacy is a mistaken belief. A formal fallacy is one in which the argument itself is wrong, which makes it always wrong. An informal fallacy is one in which the reasoning is wrong, not the form of the argument itself.
fallacy
Fallacy
Ad Hominem fallacy - it occurs when an argument is rebutted by attacking the person making the argument rather than the argument itself. This fallacy is committed when one tries to refute an argument by attacking the person's character, motive, or other attribute.
An ad hominem fallacy is when an argument attacks a person's character or traits instead of addressing the actual issue being discussed. It is considered a logical fallacy because attacking the person making an argument does not invalidate the argument itself.
it makes it weaker
He insults his opponent to distract from the real argument. (apex)