Plaintiff usually refers to when someone is bring a civil lawsuit against a defendant (i.e. when money is involved) whereas prosecutor involves the government filing charges against a defendant (usually involves a criminal charge).
The difference between the prosecution and counsel for defence is that the prosecution is the body that is representing the plaintiff who tries to convice the judge/magistrate that the defendant has committed crime while the counsel for defence is the body that is representing the defendant who tries to convince the judge/magistrate that the defendant has not committed any crime.
In the inquisitorial system of justice, there is typically no distinction between a plaintiff and a prosecutor as seen in the adversarial system. Instead, the judge oversees the investigation and collection of evidence, with input from both the prosecution and defense.
"Plaintiff's" is the possessive form of "plaintiff," indicating something belonging to a single plaintiff. "Plaintiffs'" is the plural possessive form, indicating something belonging to multiple plaintiffs.
The party who initiates a legal case is known as the plaintiff in a civil case or the prosecution in a criminal case. They are the ones bringing the case to court and seeking a resolution or remedy for the legal issue at hand.
The plaintiff is the person/organization alleging wrongdoing and asking the court to grant relief (usually in the form of money from the defendant); the defendant is the person/organization that is accused of the wrongdoing.
The difference between the prosecution and counsel for defence is that the prosecution is the body that is representing the plaintiff who tries to convice the judge/magistrate that the defendant has committed crime while the counsel for defence is the body that is representing the defendant who tries to convince the judge/magistrate that the defendant has not committed any crime.
If the prosecution can prove beyond all doubt that the plaintiff committed the crime - the prosecution wins the case, and the plaintiff (now a criminal) is sentenced. If the defence proves that the plaintiff could not have committed the crime - the defence wins and the plaintiff is free to go.
In a legal case, a petitioner and respondent are terms used in civil cases, where the petitioner is the party bringing the case to court and the respondent is the party being sued. On the other hand, in criminal cases, the terms plaintiff and defendant are used, with the plaintiff being the prosecution bringing charges against the defendant.
The first name in a case is the side that is bringing the case and is either the plaintiff or the prosecution.
The wording of the question is too cryptic - however - it appears that the Plaintiffs claim was dismissed due to the plaintiff's lack of prosecution (e.g.: The plaintiff failed to appear in court to press their case -or- the plaintiff withdrew their case- etc).
In the inquisitorial system of justice, there is typically no distinction between a plaintiff and a prosecutor as seen in the adversarial system. Instead, the judge oversees the investigation and collection of evidence, with input from both the prosecution and defense.
"Plaintiff's" is the possessive form of "plaintiff," indicating something belonging to a single plaintiff. "Plaintiffs'" is the plural possessive form, indicating something belonging to multiple plaintiffs.
the "PLAINTIFF" is the person or party that brings suit against the "DEFENDANT." The term "plaintiff" is applicable only when referring to civil lawsuits otherwise (in criminal law) the plaintiff is referred to as the "PROSECUTION."
The plaintiff - their legal representative outlines the case for the prosecution. It's then up to the defence barrister to answer the allegations on behalf of the defendant.
malicious prosecution,i would say, is an action for damages against the plaintiff by the defendant on various grounds....but solely out of malice,ill-will,spite....when i mentioned various grounds i meant that they were just excuses that the defendant used to prosecute the plaintiff whereas in fact his main reason was malice. here,the plaintiff and defendant can be old enemies or even competetors in the industrial realm or otherwise.Also, this case of malicious prosecution will not be justified by facts....rather it will be a a case brought about just to injure he plaintiff.
In criminal court. There is the prosecution and the defense.Added: In a civil case it is the Plaintiff and the Defendant
The Plaintiff goes first because they are the people suing the defendant, which gives them the ability tp go first.