plaintiff's refers to a single plaintiff (possesive) and plaintiffs' refers to more than one plaintiff (possesive)
The plural possessive form, plaintiffs'consent, is the correct form for the consent of the plaintiffs.
If you are talking about one plaintiff, then it is: Plaintiff's Complaint. If it is the complaint of many plaintiffs, then it would be: Plaintiffs' Complaint.
The plural form of plaintiff is plaintiffs.
what's the difference between injustice and unjust
difference between national and international awards
The plural possessive form, plaintiffs'consent, is the correct form for the consent of the plaintiffs.
plaintiffs
The plural form of plaintiff is plaintiffs.
If you are talking about one plaintiff, then it is: Plaintiff's Complaint. If it is the complaint of many plaintiffs, then it would be: Plaintiffs' Complaint.
Plaintiffs do not have a surrebuttal. They have a rebuttal. Defendants reply is the surreebuttal. Plaintiffs case in chief Defendants case in chief Plaintiffs rebuttal Defendants surrebuttal
Not enough information contained in question.. Plaintiffs motion for WHAT? Motion for relief of WHAT?
(2 or more) Plaintiffs' Plural possessive (1 only) Plaintiff's Singular possessive
Yes they do.
no
Piccadilly Circus - 1976 Plaintiffs and Defendants was released on: USA: 16 July 1977
difference between as on and as at
The facts are straightforward and undisputed. On December 30, 2002, plaintiffs purchased a new motor home manufactured by defendant, which is located in Indiana. From the time that plaintiffs took possession of the motor home, water continuously leaked into it. Plaintiffs took the motor home to the dealer for repair of the leaks on several occasions, but the dealer failed to successfully fix the leaks. Plaintiffs also had several phone conversations with representatives of defendant, including the president of defendant, but again the leaks were not corrected. On December 23, 2003, plaintiffs' attorney mailed a letter to defendant notifying it of the leaks and the failed attempts to correct the leaks. In the letter, plaintiffs asked defendant to replace the vehicle in accordance with ORS 646.335. (1) The letter did not reach defendant until December 29, 2003, and plaintiffs filed their complaint the next day. (2) The trial court entered a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, rejecting defendant's contention that it did not have an opportunity to correct the defect before plaintiffs filed the action.