0
Whether the person was considered property
Wiki User
∙ 8y ago
Indentured servants were contracted to work for a specific period of time to pay off their debt or passage to the New World, after which they could gain freedom. In contrast, slaves were considered property for life and had no legal rights or freedom. Indentured servants were typically white Europeans, while slaves were predominantly Africans.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What these is a reason landowners would rather have slaves than indentured servants?
Landowners may prefer slaves over indentured servants because slaves are considered property with no time limit on their labor, while indentured servants have a set term of service and can negotiate for their rights. Slaves also provide a more stable and long-term workforce compared to indentured servants who may leave once their contract is fulfilled. Additionally, slaves can be seen as a permanent source of labor that can be inherited and passed down through generations.
Why did landowners prefer slaves to indentured servants?
Landowners preferred slaves to indentured servants because slaves were considered a lifetime investment and were seen as property that could be bought, sold, and passed down to future generations. In comparison, indentured servants were only required to work for a set number of years before gaining their freedom, making them a less desirable option for long-term labor needs. Additionally, slaves were seen as a more reliable and permanent source of labor, as they had no legal rights or ability to renegotiate their contracts like indentured servants.
Why would landower rather use slaves than indentured servents?
Landowners preferred using slaves over indentured servants because slaves were seen as a lifelong and inheritable source of labor, while indentured servants could only work for a limited period of time. Slaves were also considered to be a more profitable and reliable workforce as they were seen as a long-term investment. Additionally, the racial hierarchy of the time often justified the use of slaves over indentured servants.
What is a reason landowners would rather have slaves then indentured slaves?
Landowners may prefer slaves over indentured servants because slaves are considered property and have lifelong servitude, while indentured servants have a set period of servitude and can demand compensation or freedom after their term is complete. This gives landowners more control and long-term labor security with slaves.
How were indentured servants similar and different from slaves?
Indentured servants and slaves were similar in that both groups were bound to perform labor for a specified period of time. However, indentured servants typically agreed to work for a certain number of years in exchange for passage to a new country or other benefits, while slaves were considered property and had no control over their labor or freedom. Indentured servants could eventually gain their freedom after their term of service was completed, while slaves were perpetually owned and considered property with no rights.
Did Jamestown use slaves or indentured servants?
They used indentured servants.
Did new England have indentured servants or slaves?
New England had indentured servants
Did Plantation workers include indentured servants and slaves?
No. Indentured workers were very early in colonial history and slaves replaced them as workers.
Where there a alot of indentured servants or slaves in the colony of New York?
There were a significant number of indentured servants in the colony of New York. Slavery also existed in the colony, but it was not as prevalent as in some other southern colonies. However, over time, the number of slaves in New York grew due to various factors like the growth of the economy and labor demands.
Why did the Jamestown settlers want indentured servants and slaves?
When the colonies required indentured servants or slaves it was to do the work. The first slave arrived in Jamestown in 1609 and after tobacco got a start in the colony workers were needed. Indentured servants didn't work out as well, so more slaves were brought in than indentured servants.
How are slaves different to indentured servants?
Slaves are owned by other people. Indentured servants signed a 7 year contract and were free people.
How many indentured servants did colonial New York have?
New York had indentured servants and slaves.
Indentured servants left plantations at the end of their contracts as time went on planters replaced indentured servants with?
Slaves
Indentured servants left plantations at the end of their contracts. As time went on Planters replaced indentured servants with?
Slaves
Slaves and indentured servants were first brought to North American to work producing?
slaves and indentured servants were first brought to north American to work producing
Why did landowners prefer slaves to indentured servants?
Landowners preferred slaves to indentured servants because slaves were considered a lifetime investment and were seen as property that could be bought, sold, and passed down to future generations. In comparison, indentured servants were only required to work for a set number of years before gaining their freedom, making them a less desirable option for long-term labor needs. Additionally, slaves were seen as a more reliable and permanent source of labor, as they had no legal rights or ability to renegotiate their contracts like indentured servants.
Did Sacagawea own any slaves or indentured servants?
No!
