answersLogoWhite

0

Indentured servants were free people and signed a 7 year contract. Slaves were not free, they were bought and sold, put in chains, seen as property, and owned by other humans.

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Law

In what way was the life of an indentured servant different from that of a slave?

Indentured servants were contracted to work for a specific period of time in exchange for passage to a new country or other benefits, while slaves were considered property for life. Indentured servants could eventually gain their freedom and sometimes even acquire land or other opportunities, whereas slaves had no such prospects for independence. Additionally, indentured servants typically had legal rights and protections that slaves did not.


What these is a reason landowners would rather have slaves than indentured servants?

Landowners may prefer slaves over indentured servants because slaves are considered property with no time limit on their labor, while indentured servants have a set term of service and can negotiate for their rights. Slaves also provide a more stable and long-term workforce compared to indentured servants who may leave once their contract is fulfilled. Additionally, slaves can be seen as a permanent source of labor that can be inherited and passed down through generations.


How are slaves and indentured slaves different?

Theoretically an indentured servant can eventually become free after he's worked long enough.


Why did landowners prefer slaves to indentured servants?

Slaves could be worked longer and harder and treated poorer than indentured servants, making them a financially better deal for the owners. In addition, as the laws changed, the children of slaves became slaves themselves. Indentured servants would move on when their debt was paid.


Why would landower rather use slaves than indentured servents?

Landowners preferred using slaves over indentured servants because slaves were seen as a lifelong and inheritable source of labor, while indentured servants could only work for a limited period of time. Slaves were also considered to be a more profitable and reliable workforce as they were seen as a long-term investment. Additionally, the racial hierarchy of the time often justified the use of slaves over indentured servants.

Related Questions

How are slaves different to indentured servants?

Slaves are owned by other people. Indentured servants signed a 7 year contract and were free people.


Did Jamestown use slaves or indentured servants?

They used indentured servants.


Did new England have indentured servants or slaves?

New England had indentured servants


Did Plantation workers include indentured servants and slaves?

No. Indentured workers were very early in colonial history and slaves replaced them as workers.


How are indentured servants and slaves different?

Theoretically an indentured servant can eventually become free after he's worked long enough.


Why did the Jamestown settlers want indentured servants and slaves?

When the colonies required indentured servants or slaves it was to do the work. The first slave arrived in Jamestown in 1609 and after tobacco got a start in the colony workers were needed. Indentured servants didn't work out as well, so more slaves were brought in than indentured servants.


How many indentured servants did colonial New York have?

New York had indentured servants and slaves.


Which colony has few slaves but many indentured servants?

The colony with few slaves but many indentured servants was Virginia. In the early days of the colony, before the widespread use of African slaves, indentured servants from England were a significant source of labor.


Indentured servants left plantations at the end of their contracts as time went on planters replaced indentured servants with?

Slaves


Slaves and indentured servants were first brought to North American to work producing?

slaves and indentured servants were first brought to north American to work producing


Did Sacagawea own any slaves or indentured servants?

No!


How did indentured servitude benefit employers?

Indentured servants were cheaper to employers compared to slaves.