0
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Vivi
Ross
RafaIndentured servants and slaves were similar in that both groups were bound to perform labor for a specified period of time. However, indentured servants typically agreed to work for a certain number of years in exchange for passage to a new country or other benefits, while slaves were considered property and had no control over their labor or freedom. Indentured servants could eventually gain their freedom after their term of service was completed, while slaves were perpetually owned and considered property with no rights.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
In what way was the life of an indentured servant different from that of a slave?
Indentured servants were contracted to work for a specific period of time in exchange for passage to a new country or other benefits, while slaves were considered property for life. Indentured servants could eventually gain their freedom and sometimes even acquire land or other opportunities, whereas slaves had no such prospects for independence. Additionally, indentured servants typically had legal rights and protections that slaves did not.
What these is a reason landowners would rather have slaves than indentured servants?
Landowners may prefer slaves over indentured servants because slaves are considered property with no time limit on their labor, while indentured servants have a set term of service and can negotiate for their rights. Slaves also provide a more stable and long-term workforce compared to indentured servants who may leave once their contract is fulfilled. Additionally, slaves can be seen as a permanent source of labor that can be inherited and passed down through generations.
How are slaves and indentured slaves different?
Theoretically an indentured servant can eventually become free after he's worked long enough.
Why did landowners prefer slaves to indentured servants?
Landowners preferred slaves to indentured servants because slaves were considered a lifetime investment and were seen as property that could be bought, sold, and passed down to future generations. In comparison, indentured servants were only required to work for a set number of years before gaining their freedom, making them a less desirable option for long-term labor needs. Additionally, slaves were seen as a more reliable and permanent source of labor, as they had no legal rights or ability to renegotiate their contracts like indentured servants.
Why would landower rather use slaves than indentured servents?
Landowners preferred using slaves over indentured servants because slaves were seen as a lifelong and inheritable source of labor, while indentured servants could only work for a limited period of time. Slaves were also considered to be a more profitable and reliable workforce as they were seen as a long-term investment. Additionally, the racial hierarchy of the time often justified the use of slaves over indentured servants.
