Indentured servants were free people and signed a 7 year contract. Slaves were not free, they were bought and sold, put in chains, seen as property, and owned by other humans.
There never were slaves in NY, but there were indentured servants at first. Later, they faded out.
Slaves could be worked longer and harder and treated poorer than indentured servants, making them a financially better deal for the owners. In addition, as the laws changed, the children of slaves became slaves themselves. Indentured servants would move on when their debt was paid.
Mass
The indentured servants had to work since they got paid a lot of money and the slaves were forced to work and there master treated them badly
They feared an uprising of the indentured white servants and, unlike the indentured servants, slaves would be servants for life instead of the usual 7+ years.
Slaves are owned by other people. Indentured servants signed a 7 year contract and were free people.
They used indentured servants.
New England had indentured servants
No. Indentured workers were very early in colonial history and slaves replaced them as workers.
There never were slaves in NY, but there were indentured servants at first. Later, they faded out.
Theoretically an indentured servant can eventually become free after he's worked long enough.
When the colonies required indentured servants or slaves it was to do the work. The first slave arrived in Jamestown in 1609 and after tobacco got a start in the colony workers were needed. Indentured servants didn't work out as well, so more slaves were brought in than indentured servants.
New York had indentured servants and slaves.
Slaves
Slaves
slaves and indentured servants were first brought to north American to work producing
Slaves could be worked longer and harder and treated poorer than indentured servants, making them a financially better deal for the owners. In addition, as the laws changed, the children of slaves became slaves themselves. Indentured servants would move on when their debt was paid.