Yes, physical geography can influence migration routes by creating barriers like mountains, deserts, or bodies of water that migrants have to navigate around or through. Additionally, physical geography can impact the availability of resources along migration routes, affecting decisions on where to settle or pass through.
A city is typically classified as an urban area that is larger and more densely populated than a town or village. Cities are characterized by a concentration of economic, cultural, and social activities, and often serve as hubs for transportation, business, and government services.
Most early plantations in the British colonies were located near rivers or bodies of water for irrigation, transportation, and trade purposes. This proximity ensured access to water for crops, as well as a means of transporting goods to market.
Human geography of France refers to the study of how humans interact with and shape the physical environment in France. This includes examining population distribution, migration patterns, cultural diversity, urbanization, economic activities, and political organization within the country. Human geographers in France explore the spatial relationships between people and their environment, and how these interactions influence society and development.
Port cities were important because they served as hubs for trade and commerce, connecting regions and facilitating the exchange of goods and ideas. They were also vital for transportation and communication, allowing for the movement of people and products across land and sea. Additionally, port cities often developed diverse cultural influences as a result of being gateways to the outside world.
slave trade
No. Slavery and the slave trade had been going on in Africa for centuries before the Atlantic Slave trade came into being.
How about the Egyptians, Babylonians and others enslaving the Hebrews about 2500 BC? Read Genesis and Exodus in the Old Testament.
sometimes African tribal kings would use capture and use men from other tribes to sell to the slave trade in exchange for weapons. They cant be blamed for the slave trade but they did help it along so in a way they kind of are to blame
The abolitionists, a group dedicated to ending this. Kind of the Human Rights group of that time
well, none, other than the remote possibility that there new masters were kind, or willing to free them
Africans engaged in the transatlantic slave trade primarily due to economic motives, as the trade provided access to valuable European goods, weapons, and resources. Additionally, some African societies participated in the slave trade to acquire power and influence through alliances with European traders. It is important to note that the slave trade was facilitated and intensified by European colonization and exploitation of Africa.
it is classified as an anerobic exercise
it depends on what century you are talking about and what kind of people you are talking about. southerners usually supported it. northerners could be a little hesitant
It is not clear to what period or what kind of trade you are referring. If it's the trade after the discovery of the Americas the countries most involved were Spain and Portugal and later, England. If it's the transatlantic slave trade, the countries involved were England and the United States, and to a lesser extent Portugal and the Dutch Republic.
I want to know about the case that advantages and disadvantages of Migration in JVM. Thanks
a slave trate was done by Spain people who used africans to grow crops.they started to trade because many people need it