answersLogoWhite

0

Answer:In order to answer this question, we first need a definition of the word, "Addicted". Not too long ago, an addictive substance was something that, when taken long enough, produced gross physiological changes in the way the body worked, so that normal operation of the body was impossible without that substance being ingested. And as the substance must, by definition, form a tolerance, higher and higher dosages (up to a point) were needed. This is the definition of "addictive" I'm going to use for this explanation. Addictive is not the same as "habituating". Habituatingsubstances, using this definition, are things you crave, may even come to need, but do not create a gross physiological change in the way your body works (trace neurological and neuro-chemical changes can and do happen but, they're quite minor, and they aren't always substance-related: stroking a pet for instance, can cause such trace effects).

In the cases of alcohol and barbiturates, the addiction, in the sense I describe, is very strong. Stopping these drugs suddenly for extreme addictions usually will require hospitalization, additional medication to treat symptoms of withdrawal and, especially, in the case of barbiturates, may result in death. Lesser addictions like heroin or opiates can also cause withdrawal syndromes, although not as strongly as ethanol or barbiturates, and opiate withdrawal is not fatal (barring the existence of other factors).

The active ingredient in Cannabis Sativa is THC (Delta-1-Tetrahydrocannibinol). THC is active in very low dosages. Therapeutic THC is typically delivered 5mg T.I.D. (three times a day). As addiction in the sense I mean it is a gross process, tiny dosages typically don't generate the large-scale physiological changes a true addiction needs to get revved up (neurological yes; physio no). So most people, scientists and street-users, think of marijuana as non-addictive. A recent study at Columbia University offers potentially contradictory evidence, but it's still only one study and not accepted as universal fact at this time. As such, if you say THC is not clinically addictive, most of the world will agree with you.

Can marijuana be habituating? Absolutely -- but not universally. Just as some people definitely use Marijuana in a manner that can only be described as a habit, some have used marijuana for years but not in a habitual pattern. While the same can be said for alcohol, it seems that alcoholics really do set up a regular pattern of extensive use that I personally don't see nearly as frequently in marijuana users.

In cases of marijuana habituation, I think the causal factors are obscure. With addictive drugs, we can see clear, obvious, repeatable effects in terms of addiction. With marijuana, we see far less predictable results. And why these results are not as predictable is not clear.

The basic fact is that most marijuana uses (maybe all marijuana users) do not display signs of addiction (as defined above).
Summary of previous responses:Many note anecdotal evidence gathered by their own personal use. While this doesn't carry the weight of clinical trials, it also cannot be discounted. Many users reporting here mention what -- based on my definitions above -- would be described as habituation, both mild or strong. Many indicate it's a part of their daily life. None list physiological symptoms caused by withdrawal.

Some mention that people enter rehabilitation, calming marijuana addiction. I would counter by saying that rehabilitation is a cure for a myriad of problems; not just pure addictions, and typically refers to holistic lifestyle change as the solution; not simply breaking the addiction/habituation. So entering rehab in order to address life problems related to marijuana usage is not proof that marijuana is addictive.

Some indicate that they feel THC is addictive when used by those with an "addictive personality". I would counter by saying that, without symptoms of withdrawal syndrome, genetic predisposition for addiction (which is most often used in a context describing a behavioral symptom set rather than a physiological one), does not come into play. No physiological withdrawal symptoms; no addiction.

Some indicate correctly that Cannaibis does not contain nicotine (true), which therefore means it's non-addictive. This syllogism is untrue in that the lack of nicotine only means there's no nicotine addiction in play. This contributor closes by saying THC is non-addictive, which seems to be the general feeling in the scientific community at this time.

It's not physically addicitive in the same way that nicotine is but is psychologically addictive. Modern Marijuana - aka skunk contains much higher levels of Tetra Hydro Cannabinol than the stuff that was around in the 60s/70s.
Anyone smoking this stuff should be very careful.
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

RossRoss
Every question is just a happy little opportunity.
Chat with Ross
ReneRene
Change my mind. I dare you.
Chat with Rene
ViviVivi
Your ride-or-die bestie who's seen you through every high and low.
Chat with Vivi
More answers

Marijuana the plant itself is not addictive that is the most common misconception of the drug although its not, what it can be laced with is very addictive aswell as the universal feeling u get from every drug called a 'high' wich most drug addicts are extremely dependent on. drug dealers theese days lace the drug with extecy or herion or even crack wich can make it very addictive. So short answer no marijuan in its purest form is absoloutley no addictive.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
User Avatar

You see, in most cases, marijuana is not considered addictive by most users only because it is not physically addictive. This means that your body will not go through physical withdrawals in the case you suddenly stop taking it after a history of constant use. It IS, however, psychologically addictive, meaning that the one-time marijuana smoker will initially be addicted to the physical process of smoking, the simple desire to reach the high, and/or the social context in which it brings.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago
User Avatar

Not necessarily, its a mental thing where you want more not need, rather than you neeeding more with harder drugs llike cocain or heroin. Those drugs replace some feelings or make the brain think that it needs that certain drug to make it think or process information. yes i smoke weed :). No you dont get chemicaly addictive but you get mentaly addicted, you can stop any time YOU want. If you really want to.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
User Avatar

Physically i don't think so but mentally, yes. Ask anyone who's tried to quit cold turkey after smoking several times a day for months or years. You tend to get stressed pretty easy and kind of short with people. I say if there's a craving; there's an addiction.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
User Avatar

Marijuana is not addictive physically but it makes you depressed and it gets you mentally addicted

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago
User Avatar

No, you decide to be addicted to something with the help of chemicals in the substance. Marijuana is a natural plant that doesn't usually have anything laced with it. So no

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
User Avatar

noo jus smoke all day long

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Is marijuana addictive to the body or the mind?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp