0
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Rafa
Coach
MaxineLegalizing marijuana could be considered utilitarianism because it focuses on increasing overall happiness and minimizing harm for the majority of people. It allows individuals to make choices regarding their personal well-being and reduces the negative consequences associated with criminalization, such as overcrowded prisons and wasted resources. Overall, legalizing marijuana could lead to a net positive impact on society by promoting individual freedom and reducing social costs.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What are some examples that illustrate the differences between act and rule utilitarianism?
One example that illustrates the differences between act and rule utilitarianism is the scenario of lying. In act utilitarianism, an individual would consider lying acceptable if it results in the greatest overall happiness in a specific situation. However, in rule utilitarianism, lying is generally considered wrong because following a rule of honesty tends to lead to greater overall happiness in the long run.
What are the differences between act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism, and can you provide examples of each in practice?
Act utilitarianism focuses on the consequences of individual actions to determine what is morally right, while rule utilitarianism emphasizes following rules that lead to the greatest overall happiness. An example of act utilitarianism would be a doctor deciding to save the life of a patient in critical condition, even if it means breaking hospital rules. On the other hand, an example of rule utilitarianism would be a society adopting a rule that prohibits stealing, as following this rule generally leads to greater overall happiness even if there are occasional exceptions where stealing might seem justified.
What would utilitarianism rights theory and justice say about exxonmobil amerada hess and marathon oil?
Utilitarianism would likely evaluate these companies based on the overall impact of their actions on society's well-being. Rights theory would focus on whether the companies are respecting the rights of individuals, such as workers and community members. Justice theory would examine whether these companies are distributing benefits and burdens fairly and equitably among all stakeholders.
Does utilitarianism agree that it might be true that society as a whole would benefit by having some group discriminated against?
No, utilitarianism typically does not support discriminating against a particular group as it prioritizes maximizing overall happiness and well-being. Discriminating against a group would likely cause harm and suffering to that group, which goes against the core principle of maximizing overall utility.
What philosophical principle did managers adopt when deciding that the benefits of operating in china outweighed the cost?
Utilitarianism - the principle of maximizing overall happiness or benefits for the majority. Managers likely determined that operating in China would result in greater benefits (profit, market access, etc.) for the company and its stakeholders compared to the costs involved.
