Based on the formulation of the question, I assume that he's a 250-lb man with 50 lb of fat. Fat cells require virtually zero maintenance calories so he's only maintaining his target weight. If he's a reasonably young, reasonably active man with a reasonably healthy metabolism, his maintenance diet is approximately 3,000 calories per day. (I'm not getting out nutritional tables and a calculator, so my figures are probably only accurate to plus or minus 20%, but then so are most diets. ^_^) Every pound of fat represents 3,000 calories, so in order to lose 50 pounds he needs to reduce his intake by 150,000 calories over ninety days, which is between 1,500 and 1,600 calories per day. Subtracting that from his maintenance quote of 3,000 calories, we calculate his weight-loss diet at a little less than 1,500 calories per day. He'll have no trouble getting enough vitamins, minerals and other nutrients at that level of consumption, assuming he knows his way around the vitamin store and has some basic knowledge of nutrition, for example regarding fat-soluble vitamins and calcium-magnesium balance. However, he'll be very hungry. His body will metabolize his stored fat but that does not provide the same satiated feeling as metabolizing a good meal. Some people suggest that he'll have another, more serious long-term problem. They point to our fundamental nature as hunter-gatherers from an era when there was never enough of a food surplus to survive a serious famine. They point to people who have gone on crash diets and discovered afterward that their maintenance diet was 200-400 calories lower than it used to be... even after gaining the weight back. (I know someone that happened to but I don't know how prevalent it actually is.) Your Stone Age body goes into "famine mode" when it doesn't get what it considers enough to eat, and becomes more efficient at making do on what it has. According to this hypothesis and anecdotal evidence, this man will lose his nervous tics, he'll sleep more, he'll be less active and more efficient in the activities he does perform, and he'll find his food more thoroughly digested. And when the diet is over, his body might remain more efficient, preparing itself for the next famine. His new maintenance diet may be only 2,600 calories so he'll have a harder time maintaining his target weight. I don't know if this reasoning is correct but I have seen the phenomenon up close and it isn't pretty: a 180-lb person who can now gain weight on a 1200-calorie diet. It's suggested that the healthiest approach to weight loss is to attempt to lose no more than two pounds per month, which reduces your intake by 200 calories per day. That will not (according to the hypothesis) scare your body into famine mode. And in addition, since it will take you longer to lose the weight and you won't be starving yourself, you'll have a better chance of adapting to a lifelong lower-calorie diet. In any case, reducing his daily intake by 1,500 calories does not sound pleasant or healthy, not to mention whether he has the will power to endure the very real discomfort and keep it up for three months. This man will probably run out to the nearest McDonalds as soon as the event he lost his weight for is behind him.
the average human needs 2000 through 3000 calories to stay healthy
a normal amount, but just do a lot of exercise
Whatever the retailer wants to sell it for !
reduce calories to 1100 a day and try to get at least three hours of cardio in a week (anything that makes you sweat like runnng, walking uphill, swimming vigerously) that sort of thing can definatly help you loose weight
That's like asking "Can I walk into a room, speak in Hebrew, and call it English ?" You can describe a weight in terms of 'pounds'. If somebody wants to know the weight in terms of an SI unit, then the 'pounds' can easily be converted to one. But you can't just give him the number of 'pounds' and call it an SI unit, because 'pound' is not an SI unit and it never will be one.
Anything he wants.
As many as the geek wants.
First you should make sure it is healthy for someone of your sex, height, and body type to lose that much weight. If you are currently overweight and can safely lose 28 lbs, then this is feasible and will likely take between 4 and 6 months. First you'll need to assess how many calories you burn during an interval of exercise on a rowing machine. Most machines will tell you how many calories you've burned during a session. One pound of fat is about 3,500 calories. If you burn 100 calories in 10 minutes of rowing, and you row for 350 minutes a week, then you'll lose 1 pound a week just from rowing.
To maintain a weight of 140 pounds, a sedentary 60-year-old woman who is five feet tall would need approximately 1,600-1,800 calories per day. However, individual calorie needs can vary based on factors like activity level and metabolism. It is best to consult with a healthcare provider or nutritionist for personalized advice.
who wants the answer to this only twinkies what to know
3 meters
It depends how high at the job you are but a lawyer would get paid paid at least 70,000 pound pound every 6 months and a actress would get paid 55,494 per every 3 months moths so 55,494 times four and 70,000 times two. So for an actress it will be 211,976 pounds per year ( whhhoooo) and for a lawyer it will be 140,000 per year but either job is amazing. I want to be a actress and one of my best friends wants to be a lawyer so i decided to do this xx xx