without a bunker, it is very unlikely youll be 'safe'. as to the fact there is alot of radiation involved, so if you survive the explosion you may be killed by the following radiation.
No. LLNL even tested several Uranium-Hydride bombs in the 1950s. Even though their computer models said the devices should explode, none gave a nuclear yield. One could use the waste from the reactor as a Radiological Weapon, but the reactor itself is not useful as a weapon.
A nuclear weapon can be dropped from a plane by using strategic bombers or fighter jets equipped with release mechanisms that allow the weapon to be safely deployed at a specified altitude and location. The plane flies over the target area, releases the weapon, and quickly moves away to a safe distance before detonation. This method is part of nuclear deterrence strategies employed by some countries.
Maybe. If ABM was nuclear itself, it will probably cause fratricide in the warhead causing it to dud. If ABM is conventional it might detonate conventional explosives in warhead. Whether this produces yield or not depends on how safe the warhead was designed against one point detonation nuclear yield.
The biggest nuclear weapon ever tested was the Tsar Bomba, a hydrogen bomb detonated by the Soviet Union in 1961. It had a yield of 50 megatons, making it the most powerful nuclear weapon ever detonated.
A nuclear weapon is one of the most powerful weapons in existence, so it is difficult to say if there is a specific weapon that is definitively stronger. However, some may argue that certain future technologies, such as antimatter weapons or advanced cyber warfare capabilities, could potentially surpass the destructive power of a nuclear weapon.
The meaning of the word nuclear weapon, is a weapon that has a nuclear warhead on it.
This nuclear weapon is called an atomic bomb or a nuclear bomb
Nuclear weapon detonations
If by "bomb" you mean a conventional explosive weapon, then the nuclear weapon is more powerful.
nuclear chemicals such as plutonium
NO
no
No. LLNL even tested several Uranium-Hydride bombs in the 1950s. Even though their computer models said the devices should explode, none gave a nuclear yield. One could use the waste from the reactor as a Radiological Weapon, but the reactor itself is not useful as a weapon.
the first nuclear weapon was issued in WW2 created by the americans in a chicargo squash court
plutonium + weapon
A nuclear weapon can be dropped from a plane by using strategic bombers or fighter jets equipped with release mechanisms that allow the weapon to be safely deployed at a specified altitude and location. The plane flies over the target area, releases the weapon, and quickly moves away to a safe distance before detonation. This method is part of nuclear deterrence strategies employed by some countries.
Maybe. If ABM was nuclear itself, it will probably cause fratricide in the warhead causing it to dud. If ABM is conventional it might detonate conventional explosives in warhead. Whether this produces yield or not depends on how safe the warhead was designed against one point detonation nuclear yield.